Editing 2239: Data Error

Jump to: navigation, search

Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision Your text
Line 23: Line 23:
  
 
Whatever Megan's data error was, it seems harmless enough, but a similar data error spurred the development of nuclear weapons.  In 1940, Otto Frisch and Rudolf Peierls wrote a memo "{{w|Frisch–Peierls memorandum|On the construction of a 'superbomb' based on a nuclear chain reaction in uranium}}".  In this memo, Frisch and Peierls estimated that only 570 grams of uranium-235 would be required to construct a "superbomb" (what we now call a nuclear weapon), compared to many tons of natural uranium-238.  This inspired the British and American governments to begin developing infrastructure for uranium enrichment through the {{w|Tube Alloys}} and {{w|Manhattan Project}} programs.  Later experiments in these programs revealed that the values Frisch and Peierls had used for uranium's density and nuclear cross-section were overestimates (the true critical mass is actually around fifty kilograms), but by that time, the programs were far enough along that they could simply press on with enriching more material to eventually produce working weapons.
 
Whatever Megan's data error was, it seems harmless enough, but a similar data error spurred the development of nuclear weapons.  In 1940, Otto Frisch and Rudolf Peierls wrote a memo "{{w|Frisch–Peierls memorandum|On the construction of a 'superbomb' based on a nuclear chain reaction in uranium}}".  In this memo, Frisch and Peierls estimated that only 570 grams of uranium-235 would be required to construct a "superbomb" (what we now call a nuclear weapon), compared to many tons of natural uranium-238.  This inspired the British and American governments to begin developing infrastructure for uranium enrichment through the {{w|Tube Alloys}} and {{w|Manhattan Project}} programs.  Later experiments in these programs revealed that the values Frisch and Peierls had used for uranium's density and nuclear cross-section were overestimates (the true critical mass is actually around fifty kilograms), but by that time, the programs were far enough along that they could simply press on with enriching more material to eventually produce working weapons.
 +
 +
Research papers require actual research<!-- Citation Needed needed -->, and sometimes when answering the planned question the resulting answer is not what might have been expected and may even make the question look misplaced and the paper superfluous or uninformative (at least in the opinion of the researcher at the time).
 +
 +
There is thus a bias<!-- dig up appropriate link to the effect? --> to papers in that null or negative results tend to be left unpublished/unpublicised while any result that strongly supports the original idea or concept being sought gets revealed to the world with far less concern about systematic errors or innacuracies.
 +
 +
In this comic, Megan finds herself with the dilemma of havingconducted research and reached a conclusion incompatible with the purpose behind that research.  Black Hat suggests that as well as "publish and be damned" in documenting the counterintuitive and unconstructive actual result, after double-checking the anomoly, there's always the option to keep quiet. But, being Black Hat, this does not just mean leaving the 'bad' result fall below the radar but also somehow using this secret information for some form or other of World Domination.
 +
 +
Megan then reveals that the problematic target of study is not something of a traditional method of Evil Overlordship (lasers, control of energies, mind control, etc) but involves presumably small samples of algae not behaving as expected.
 +
 +
The title-text does go on to record, however, that in the early stages of life on this planet there ''were'' huge environmental changes wrought by such humble (but numerous) organisms, leading to the conclusion that 'perhaps' this weaponised weirdness could do so again.  Which is either overstating their capabilities or close to an actual worst-case scenario closely related to that of a Gray Goo scenario from the field of nanotechnology but in a more biological form.
  
 
==Transcript==
 
==Transcript==

Please note that all contributions to explain xkcd may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see explain xkcd:Copyrights for details). Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

To protect the wiki against automated edit spam, we kindly ask you to solve the following CAPTCHA:

Cancel | Editing help (opens in new window)