Difference between revisions of "2455: Virus Consulting"

Explain xkcd: It's 'cause you're dumb.
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created by dgbrtBOT)
 
(categories; date)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{comic
 
{{comic
 
| number    = 2455
 
| number    = 2455
| date      = April 27, 2021
+
| date      = April 26, 2021
 
| title    = Virus Consulting
 
| title    = Virus Consulting
 
| image    = virus_consulting.png
 
| image    = virus_consulting.png
Line 14: Line 14:
  
 
{{comic discussion}}
 
{{comic discussion}}
 +
[[Category:COVID-19]]
 +
[[Category:Comics featuring Ponytail]]
 +
[[Category:Comics featuring Black Hat]]
 +
[[Category:Comics featuring Hairbun]]
 +
[[Category:Comics featuring Cueball]]
 +
[[Category:Comics featuring Megan]]

Revision as of 00:48, 27 April 2021

Virus Consulting
All our teams make an effort to stay optimistic, but I will say that once our virus division saw the vaccine efficacy data, they started asking for payment up front.
Title text: All our teams make an effort to stay optimistic, but I will say that once our virus division saw the vaccine efficacy data, they started asking for payment up front.

Explanation

Ambox notice.png This explanation may be incomplete or incorrect: Created by a BOT. Please mention here why this explanation isn't complete. Do NOT delete this tag too soon.
If you can address this issue, please edit the page! Thanks.

Transcript

Ambox notice.png This transcript is incomplete. Please help editing it! Thanks.


comment.png add a comment! ⋅ comment.png add a topic (use sparingly)! ⋅ Icons-mini-action refresh blue.gif refresh comments!

Discussion

In a way telling the virus the 'bad' news actually should get them to work on more variants, so in a way Black Hat is encouraging COVID to mutate faster :S141.101.104.5 14:52, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

Which would be typically Classhole Black Hat ;-) --Kynde (talk) 15:04, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

Anyway we don't get an answer to the question in the third pane. "They work for W.H.O.?". Hopefully this will be answered in a later comic. Inquiring minds want to know. --141.101.69.211 11:32, 28 April 2021 (UTC)

Huh? the answer is that they work for "COVID". the who question is more of a statement of surprise that COVID is a client (and isn't related to the WHO orgaization). 172.69.34.52 19:29, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
That "WHO" might be an extra layer of jokes...--141.101.105.228 00:21, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
W.H.O.'s on first. Barmar (talk) 01:19, 29 April 2021 (UTC)

Shouldn't that be: "They work for whom?" 162.158.94.104 09:53, 29 April 2021 (UTC)

"WHOM" as in "World Health Organization - Maybe" ? --141.101.104.149 22:53, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

Sigh. Here we are in 2023, and it seems like it's worked out best for everybody! That is, an everybody consisting of "people who don't get long covid" and "covid". Thankfully, it's not like people's bodies deteriorate, so I'm sure it's just gonna keep being elderly people and already-disabled people who can never go outside again. Yaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay.