Editing 2566: Decorative Constants

Jump to: navigation, search

Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision Your text
Line 33: Line 33:
 
Of these, only the Einstein field equations have been spiced up with decorative indices (which actually hide a system of ten nonlinear partial differential equations).
 
Of these, only the Einstein field equations have been spiced up with decorative indices (which actually hide a system of ten nonlinear partial differential equations).
  
In the title text Randall mentions the {{w|Drag equation}}, which is attributed to {{w|Lord Rayleigh}}. In {{w|fluid dynamics}}, the drag equation is a formula used to calculate the force of drag experienced by an object due to movement through a fully enclosing fluid. The equation is ''F''<sub>d</sub>&nbsp;=&nbsp;½''ρu''<sup>2</sup>''c''<sub>d</sub>''A''. Here ''F''<sub>d</sub> is the drag force, ρ the mass density of the fluid, u the relative flow velocity, ''c''<sub>d</sub> the {{w|drag coefficient}} and A is the area.
+
In the title text Randall mentions the {{w|Drag equation}}, which is attributed to {{w|Lord Rayleigh}}. In {{w|fluid dynamics}}, the drag equation is a formula used to calculate the force of drag experienced by an object due to movement through a fully enclosing fluid. The equation is ''F''<sub>d</sub>&nbsp;=&nbsp;½''ρu''<sup>2</sup>''c''<sub>d</sub>''A''. Here ''F''<sub>d</sub> is the drag force, ρ the mass density of the fluid, u the relative flow velocity, ''c''<sub>d</sub> the drag coefficient and A is the area.
  
 
Randall jokes that the factor of ½ in the equation is meaningless and purely decorative, since the drag coefficients, ''c''<sub>d</sub>, are already unitless and could just as easily be half as big thus leaving out the ½ in front of the equation. The ½ is thus just an example of a "decorative constant." The usual reason for including the factor of ½ is that it is part of the formula for kinetic energy that appears in the derivation of the drag equation, i.e. ½''ρu''<sup>2</sup>. However, modern treatments are so condensed that this factor of ½ is often smuggled in with no explanation.  
 
Randall jokes that the factor of ½ in the equation is meaningless and purely decorative, since the drag coefficients, ''c''<sub>d</sub>, are already unitless and could just as easily be half as big thus leaving out the ½ in front of the equation. The ½ is thus just an example of a "decorative constant." The usual reason for including the factor of ½ is that it is part of the formula for kinetic energy that appears in the derivation of the drag equation, i.e. ½''ρu''<sup>2</sup>. However, modern treatments are so condensed that this factor of ½ is often smuggled in with no explanation.  

Please note that all contributions to explain xkcd may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see explain xkcd:Copyrights for details). Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

To protect the wiki against automated edit spam, we kindly ask you to solve the following CAPTCHA:

Cancel | Editing help (opens in new window)