Difference between revisions of "Talk:1001: AAAAAA"

Explain xkcd: It's 'cause you're dumb.
Jump to: navigation, search
(Turing beds anyone?)
Line 4: Line 4:
  
 
Maybe Megan and Cueball would have been more turned on if they instead made a Turing bed.[[Special:Contributions/66.88.136.254|66.88.136.254]] 21:24, 20 March 2013 (UTC)
 
Maybe Megan and Cueball would have been more turned on if they instead made a Turing bed.[[Special:Contributions/66.88.136.254|66.88.136.254]] 21:24, 20 March 2013 (UTC)
 +
 +
The explanation needs to be fixed. The phrase "The rotating bed is supposed to be a sexy device" implies that the device ''itself'' is sexy. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.216.45|108.162.216.45]] 20:57, 12 November 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:57, 12 November 2013

The usefulness of rotation in romance has been mentioned before in 162: Angular Momentum. Perhaps the problem is that they are spinning the bed clockwise instead of counter-clockwise? Erenan (talk) 19:18, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

I think the difference lies in the commonly understood meaning of rotation as opposed to say spinning. Rotating can mean slow or fast, but spinning is usually faster. Is there a word that implies a gentleness to the rotation. They probably want a pivoting or turning bed. DruidDriver (talk) 01:00, 16 January 2013 (UTC)

Maybe Megan and Cueball would have been more turned on if they instead made a Turing bed.66.88.136.254 21:24, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

The explanation needs to be fixed. The phrase "The rotating bed is supposed to be a sexy device" implies that the device itself is sexy. 108.162.216.45 20:57, 12 November 2013 (UTC)