Difference between revisions of "Talk:1083: Writing Styles"
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
There's also a bit of political commentary here, which has so far been skirted over, suggesting that much of the cheerleading for (the highly libertarian) Ron Paul comes from youthful and, by implication, politically naive commentators. | There's also a bit of political commentary here, which has so far been skirted over, suggesting that much of the cheerleading for (the highly libertarian) Ron Paul comes from youthful and, by implication, politically naive commentators. | ||
14:15, 15 March 2013 (UTC)Chris C | 14:15, 15 March 2013 (UTC)Chris C | ||
| + | But how is that much different from the 2008 election of our current president which had a very youthful and as you said "naive" vibe? | ||
| + | [[Special:Contributions/63.149.29.1|63.149.29.1]] 21:44, 11 October 2013 (UTC)Robert | ||
Revision as of 21:44, 11 October 2013
Politicians don't seem to be doing this too much nowadays. Don't know about the other runners, but Obama's tweets are mostly coherent, with just a pile of gibberish hashtags appended on the end. Davidy22 (talk) 10:30, 6 October 2012 (UTC)
- Additionally politicians may be tempted to use SMS abbreviations in order to come across as younger and aware of youth culture, while their target audience actually doesn't use these abbreviations at all. 83.84.33.170 23:23, 28 February 2013 (UTC)
There's also a bit of political commentary here, which has so far been skirted over, suggesting that much of the cheerleading for (the highly libertarian) Ron Paul comes from youthful and, by implication, politically naive commentators.
14:15, 15 March 2013 (UTC)Chris C
But how is that much different from the 2008 election of our current president which had a very youthful and as you said "naive" vibe?
63.149.29.1 21:44, 11 October 2013 (UTC)Robert
