Editing Talk:1096: Clinically Studied Ingredient
Please sign your posts with ~~~~ |
Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
*:: I'll go on record that this is *not* Megan. We have a few variants of female characters based only on the hair and this is not consistent with her other appearances. --[[User:Jeff|Jeff]] ([[User talk:Jeff|talk]]) 14:29, 17 August 2012 (UTC) | *:: I'll go on record that this is *not* Megan. We have a few variants of female characters based only on the hair and this is not consistent with her other appearances. --[[User:Jeff|Jeff]] ([[User talk:Jeff|talk]]) 14:29, 17 August 2012 (UTC) | ||
*::: Approve completely; I removed all references to her. - [[User:Cos|Cos]] ([[User talk:Cos|talk]]) 23:35, 19 August 2012 (UTC) | *::: Approve completely; I removed all references to her. - [[User:Cos|Cos]] ([[User talk:Cos|talk]]) 23:35, 19 August 2012 (UTC) | ||
− | |||
* No matter how I squint at this one, that extra line just doesn't seem to make sense... unless there is a penis in this cartoon. | * No matter how I squint at this one, that extra line just doesn't seem to make sense... unless there is a penis in this cartoon. |