Difference between revisions of "Talk:1294: Telescope Names"

Explain xkcd: It's 'cause you're dumb.
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 8: Line 8:
  
 
The infinite is the size of the univers. Still there is a final after that ;-) [[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 19:28, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
 
The infinite is the size of the univers. Still there is a final after that ;-) [[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 19:28, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
 +
 +
Just a note concerning the cancelled 'Overwhelmingly Large Telescope' (=OWL): Today OWL means „Once Was Large“ because it is replaced by the ELT
  
 
;Similar topic
 
;Similar topic

Revision as of 07:48, 25 November 2013

Historically, one of the first times the issue was raised on the internet was this Slashdot article, where the name BFT was first proposed in 2000. Did Randall know it? ‎108.162.231.211 (talk) (please sign your comments with ~~~~)

The "Final Telescope" aka "James Webb Space Telescope". 108.162.222.209 11:01, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

How could he leave off the Giant Magellan Telescope? Matchups (talk) 14:13, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

Does anyone think the latter names are a nod to Doctor Who? The Nightmare Child, the Plains of Devastation, etc. 199.27.128.148 17:48, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

The infinite is the size of the univers. Still there is a final after that ;-) Kynde (talk) 19:28, 23 November 2013 (UTC)

Just a note concerning the cancelled 'Overwhelmingly Large Telescope' (=OWL): Today OWL means „Once Was Large“ because it is replaced by the ELT

Similar topic

I remember a short piece in SCIAM many years ago, where a well known physicist ironicly discussed the wish/planning/building of ever bigger colliders. Among the biggest of them, the "final collider" was described as having a diameter about the dimension of galaxy clusters. 108.162.231.54 22:28, 23 November 2013 (UTC)