Difference between revisions of "Talk:1724: Proofs"
m (Added comment.) |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Transcript generated by the BOT was murdering me, had to change it. Proposing miss Lenhart is party 1. [[User:EppOch|EppOch]] ([[User talk:EppOch|talk]]) 04:45, 24 August 2016 (UTC) | Transcript generated by the BOT was murdering me, had to change it. Proposing miss Lenhart is party 1. [[User:EppOch|EppOch]] ([[User talk:EppOch|talk]]) 04:45, 24 August 2016 (UTC) | ||
| + | :: I support that. [[Special:Contributions/141.101.91.223|141.101.91.223]] 06:13, 24 August 2016 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 06:13, 24 August 2016
Judging from my experience when I first encountered proofs in math classes (or my general experience from math classes), the teacher is going to write down a "proof" which makes absolutely no sense to students and is also never explained in a way that actually makes them understand. Instead, they are just going to use "dark magic" and write what seems to be completely senseless to students. 141.101.91.223 04:24, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
Transcript generated by the BOT was murdering me, had to change it. Proposing miss Lenhart is party 1. EppOch (talk) 04:45, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
- I support that. 141.101.91.223 06:13, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
