Difference between revisions of "Talk:173: Movie Seating"
(Offered an alternate solution for "Do not keep 8 away from 6") |
|||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
I know I'm horrifically late on this one, but surely swapping 4 and 7 is the solution which minimizes strangers in "Do not keep 8 away from 6". | I know I'm horrifically late on this one, but surely swapping 4 and 7 is the solution which minimizes strangers in "Do not keep 8 away from 6". | ||
There is currently no path from 8 to 4. Swapping 4 and 7 downgrades the link to 5 to an Acquaintance from Friendship, but offers a viable path between all members. Unless we're intentionally forcing 8 to talk to 6? [[Special:Contributions/162.158.99.64|162.158.99.64]] 08:20, 15 December 2015 (UTC) | There is currently no path from 8 to 4. Swapping 4 and 7 downgrades the link to 5 to an Acquaintance from Friendship, but offers a viable path between all members. Unless we're intentionally forcing 8 to talk to 6? [[Special:Contributions/162.158.99.64|162.158.99.64]] 08:20, 15 December 2015 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | The solutions are making assumptions about the weighting of friends, relationships, and acquaintances. Don't really see the point unless if it is explicitly specified by Randall or whoever made the solution. | ||
Revision as of 15:42, 25 December 2015
I think that "two friends ... each sitting three seats away" takes "they" a little too literally. Daddy (talk) 06:17, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
Look at it like this. Placing them _friends_ apart guarantees lower background noise so you can actually watch the movie. 108.162.231.227 (talk) (please sign your comments with ~~~~)
Truthfully, I feel one-way crush should be second priority 05:09, 14 November 2015 (UTC) Lonely...
I know I'm horrifically late on this one, but surely swapping 4 and 7 is the solution which minimizes strangers in "Do not keep 8 away from 6". There is currently no path from 8 to 4. Swapping 4 and 7 downgrades the link to 5 to an Acquaintance from Friendship, but offers a viable path between all members. Unless we're intentionally forcing 8 to talk to 6? 162.158.99.64 08:20, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
The solutions are making assumptions about the weighting of friends, relationships, and acquaintances. Don't really see the point unless if it is explicitly specified by Randall or whoever made the solution.
