Difference between revisions of "Talk:1781: Artifacts"
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Why the emphasis on HAVE in the alttext instead of, say, ENTIRELY? | Why the emphasis on HAVE in the alttext instead of, say, ENTIRELY? | ||
| + | |||
| + | Is there also a suggestion that Indiana Jones didn't properly handle artifacts he dealt with? | ||
Revision as of 14:59, 4 January 2017
Wouldnt data entirely made of outliners just be ..regular measurements that just yields different results?#GoWest-West (talk) 13:59, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
The graph that Cueball is showing looks like the graph from the EM drive paper. Maybe Randall is poking fun at the EM drive with this comic? Cgplover (talk) 14:15, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Why the emphasis on HAVE in the alttext instead of, say, ENTIRELY?
Is there also a suggestion that Indiana Jones didn't properly handle artifacts he dealt with?
