Talk:1781: Artifacts

Explain xkcd: It's 'cause you're dumb.
Revision as of 15:36, 4 January 2017 by (talk)
Jump to: navigation, search

Wouldnt data entirely made of outliners just be ..regular measurements that just yields different results?#GoWest-West (talk) 13:59, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

The graph that Cueball is showing looks like the graph from the EM drive paper. Maybe Randall is poking fun at the EM drive with this comic? Cgplover (talk) 14:15, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

It does look like the Full Resonance tuner sweep graph 15:12, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

Why the emphasis on HAVE in the alttext instead of, say, ENTIRELY?

Is there also a suggestion that Indiana Jones didn't properly handle artifacts he dealt with?

I have the feeling that I've seen this comic before. Is there another comic where Cueball gives a presentation and is then dissed by his audience? 15:36, 4 January 2017 (UTC)