Difference between revisions of "Talk:1849: Decades"
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
There seems to be a slightly tongue-in-cheek move to call the 2000's "the noughties" with the obvious implication of 'naughty'. Personally though I'm still waiting for everyone to stop saying "2000 and something, it very annoying! [[User:RoyT|RoyT]] ([[User talk:RoyT|talk]]) 14:38, 12 June 2017 (UTC) | There seems to be a slightly tongue-in-cheek move to call the 2000's "the noughties" with the obvious implication of 'naughty'. Personally though I'm still waiting for everyone to stop saying "2000 and something, it very annoying! [[User:RoyT|RoyT]] ([[User talk:RoyT|talk]]) 14:38, 12 June 2017 (UTC) | ||
<!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~--> | <!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~--> | ||
| + | |||
| + | Just a quick note to highlight the double "and" in the text: "(...) is ambiguous and and "aughts" (...)" | ||
| + | [[Special:Contributions/162.158.6.52|162.158.6.52]] 14:43, 12 June 2017 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 14:43, 12 June 2017
There seems to be a slightly tongue-in-cheek move to call the 2000's "the noughties" with the obvious implication of 'naughty'. Personally though I'm still waiting for everyone to stop saying "2000 and something, it very annoying! RoyT (talk) 14:38, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
Just a quick note to highlight the double "and" in the text: "(...) is ambiguous and and "aughts" (...)" 162.158.6.52 14:43, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
