Difference between revisions of "Talk:1863: Screenshots"
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
::Does someone has uncensored image of that? BTW we should add censorship on list of things which can degrade digital data. -- [[User:Hkmaly|Hkmaly]] ([[User talk:Hkmaly|talk]]) 00:35, 15 July 2017 (UTC) | ::Does someone has uncensored image of that? BTW we should add censorship on list of things which can degrade digital data. -- [[User:Hkmaly|Hkmaly]] ([[User talk:Hkmaly|talk]]) 00:35, 15 July 2017 (UTC) | ||
| − | + | Do you think it's coincidental that the comic numbers for this one (1863) and for the thematic predecessor (1683) are anagrams? | |
Revision as of 07:42, 15 July 2017
Is "Embarrassing Background tabs" a dig at Kurt Eichenwald? 162.158.134.70 14:00, 14 July 2017 (UTC)
- Him or just about anyone who has porn on background tabs. It's a regular occurrence these days. OldCorps (talk) 14:31, 14 July 2017 (UTC)
- Well sure, but he's probably the most triumphant example in recent media memory 162.158.134.70 14:56, 14 July 2017 (UTC)
- Ramon Perez was the first one to come to mind for me. He's a US Congressman who recently passed out a handout to the US House of Representatives Finance Committee with screen shots that included a 'MILF' tab and several 'Teen' porn tabs. 162.158.75.250 16:23, 14 July 2017 (UTC)
Do you think it's coincidental that the comic numbers for this one (1863) and for the thematic predecessor (1683) are anagrams?
