Talk:1915: Nightmare Email Feature
I feel like the comic is more about the addressee of the mail seeing how much time the sender spent on the mail. In the comic, I feel like the sender is asking about having another date with someone and try to be casual about it, which would be contradicted by the time he actually spent on it.
In the same way, the title indicates that the mail spent 3 days in the drafts while the sender writes "I just saw your message". It would be very awkward if the recipient of the mail could see that it is a lie. 188.8.131.52 14:26, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
He's always commenting on how you're responsible for how you're interpreted and now he's having difficulty managing his responsibility for how he's interpreted.184.108.40.206 16:00, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
This is MY nightmare email feature. I spend 10 minutes per line.
The paradox is that it takes a long time for Randall to craft a socially acceptable email, but it is socially unacceptable to spend a long time crafting emails. If the email's composition time becomes part of the email itself, then it is impossible for Randall to send a socially acceptable email. He is carefully choosing the right words, rhythm, and sentence structure in his emails, because he is expected to sound relaxed, natural, and off-the-cuff.
220.127.116.11 21:40, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
I see nothing within the comic to definitively indicate that the receiver is seeing the time spent composing the message. That is an assumption, whether correct or not. Personally, I think the whole comic works both ways; I would be mortified to have a ticking clock counting my time spent with a message. ... (I've spent four hours composing one SMS text.) I think the explanation should bear some indication of its nature as to which party sees the timer. 18.104.22.168 07:51, 14 November 2017 (UTC)