Difference between revisions of "Talk:2023: Y-Axis"

Explain xkcd: It's 'cause you're dumb.
Jump to: navigation, search
m
Line 5: Line 5:
  
 
To me this graph stands out as having something very wrong far more than those that limit the y axis to a short range. If the grid lines were several shades lighter however...  [[User:PotatoGod|PotatoGod]] ([[User talk:PotatoGod|talk]]) 15:44, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
 
To me this graph stands out as having something very wrong far more than those that limit the y axis to a short range. If the grid lines were several shades lighter however...  [[User:PotatoGod|PotatoGod]] ([[User talk:PotatoGod|talk]]) 15:44, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
 +
 +
Also I wonder if anyone can find a legitimate (non-misleading) use for the semi-semi-log plot? I’m sure there’s some scenario where it could be useful. Perhaps showing the population growth of a species, then when the growth levels out at the maximum sustainable level for its environment (I forget the proper term from high school biology) showing more detail of the small population changes or something like that? [[User:PotatoGod|PotatoGod]] ([[User talk:PotatoGod|talk]]) 15:52, 23 July 2018 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:52, 23 July 2018


"There are four kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, graphs, and statistics." Andyd273 (talk) 13:37, 23 July 2018 (UTC)


To me this graph stands out as having something very wrong far more than those that limit the y axis to a short range. If the grid lines were several shades lighter however... PotatoGod (talk) 15:44, 23 July 2018 (UTC)

Also I wonder if anyone can find a legitimate (non-misleading) use for the semi-semi-log plot? I’m sure there’s some scenario where it could be useful. Perhaps showing the population growth of a species, then when the growth levels out at the maximum sustainable level for its environment (I forget the proper term from high school biology) showing more detail of the small population changes or something like that? PotatoGod (talk) 15:52, 23 July 2018 (UTC)