Editing Talk:2028: Complex Numbers

<!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~ and don't delete this text. New comments should be added at the bottom.-->
I assume this is strictly a coincidence, but in reference to the title-text, I'll just mention that Caucher Birkar [the mathematician whose Fields Medal was stolen minutes after he received it in Rio de Janeiro on Weds (1Aug2018)] received the award for work in algebraic geometry. [[User:Arcanechili|Arcanechili]] ([[User talk:Arcanechili|talk]]) 16:34, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
* Perhaps it's causal not coincidental. Medal theives and perhaps Randall might read the news also. [[https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cluster=8941732171299849045&hl=en&as_sdt=0,39&sciodt=0,39]]   [[Special:Contributions/162.158.79.209|162.158.79.209]] 00:34, 4 August 2018 (UTC)

I've added a basic description of Abelian groups in the title text, and that's about as much as I know about such topics. I'm not sure what a "meta-Abelian group" is, is that an Abelian group of other groups? Also, could someone add basic descriptions of algebreic geometry and geometrical algebra? [[Special:Contributions/172.68.94.40|172.68.94.40]] 18:42, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

In the title text, since groups are a concept within mathematics, it seems odd to consider mathematics as a whole forming any sort of group within itself, which I suspect is the first part of the pun. Secondly, since groups involve the commutative property, I think the last part is a pun about the order of the words algebra and geometry, as if they're commutative themselves! [[User:Ianrbibtitlht|Ianrbibtitlht]] ([[User talk:Ianrbibtitlht|talk]]) 19:19, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
: I meant to say 'abelian' groups involve the commutative property, and the meta prefix is referring to the fact that it's about the names rather than the mathematical details - i.e. commutative in metadata only. [[User:Ianrbibtitlht|Ianrbibtitlht]] ([[User talk:Ianrbibtitlht|talk]]) 19:24, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

It's a false dilemma. Complex numbers ''are'' vectors (<math>\mathbb{C}</math> is a two-dimensional <math>\mathbb{R}</math>-vector space, and more generally every field is a vector space over any subfield), but that doesn't change anything about the fact that <math>i</math> is by definition a square root of -1. [[User:Zmatt|Zmatt]] ([[User talk:Zmatt|talk]]) 20:38, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

Important concepts in math usually show up naturally in many apparently unrelated areas.  Each area will name and define a concept that makes sense for the problems being considered.  One of the joys of math is proving that multiple, apparently unrelated, definitions are equivalent.  When definitions are equivalent you cannot pick "the one true definition" -- any of them will do.  However the principle of maximum laziness leads to the one with the easiest notion being used as a canonical definition.[[Special:Contributions/162.158.75.130|162.158.75.130]] 18:17, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

Fun factoid: not only is <math>\mathbb{C}</math> the unique proper field extension of finite degree over <math>\mathbb{R}</math> (since <math>\mathbb{C}</math> is algebraically closed), but the converse is true as well: <math>\mathbb{R}</math> is the only proper subfield of finite index in <math>\mathbb{C}</math>. They're like a weird married couple. [[User:Zmatt|Zmatt]] ([[User talk:Zmatt|talk]]) 20:53, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

Altho there are no "meta-abelian" groups there are metabelian groups. If xy=yx then the commutator [x,y]=xyx^{-1}y^{-1}=1. The group generated by the commutators -- the commutator subgroup -- is thus a measure of how far a group is from being abelian. A metabelian group is a nonabelian group whose commutator subgroup is abelian. Thus a metabelian group is one made of a stack of two abelian groups. It is "meta-abelian" in that sense. A standard example is the group of invertible upper-trianglular matrices.  The commutators all have 1s on the diagonals.

:One should note that the concept of complex numbers actually is older than vector spaces. So while it is true that complex numbers are a cool variant of vectors, historically that's not true, because vectors were more or less unknown when complex numbers were used for the first time. --[[Special:Contributions/162.158.90.6|162.158.90.6]] 09:59, 4 August 2018 (UTC)

Shouldn't the description of a group involve ''two'' operations?  There is a binary operation that gloms two things together to make a new thing, but there's also a unary operation that takes only one thing and makes a new thing -- the inverse.  Without the unary operation, you only have a {{w|semigroup}}.[[Special:Contributions/108.162.215.160|108.162.215.160]] 09:40, 5 August 2018 (UTC)
: No. The inverse operation arises as a consequence of the fact that it's a group. A group satisfies four conditions: 1. it is closed under the operation, 2. the operation is associative 3. there is an identity e such that a op e = e op a = a. 4. For every element a, there is a unique element b such that a op b = b op a = e. The inverse function falls out as a result of conditions 3 and 4 [[User:Jeremyp|Jeremyp]] ([[User talk:Jeremyp|talk]]) 10:26, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

Real numbers with regular multiplication is not a group, as zero does not have an inverse element. The example would work with addition --[[Special:Contributions/162.158.134.112|162.158.134.112]] 13:48, 9 August 2018 (UTC)Random guy who read the article


"Does any of this really have to do with vectors? Or do mathematicians just think they're too cool for regular floating point arrays? [[User:SteveBaker|SteveBaker]] ([[User talk:SteveBaker|talk]]) 16:00, 6 July 2020 (UTC)