Difference between revisions of "Talk:2319: Large Number Formats"

Explain xkcd: It's 'cause you're dumb.
Jump to: navigation, search
(Scientist avoiding rounding: new section)
Line 4: Line 4:
  
 
Would love an explanation of the scientist avoiding rounding one. Would make sense to me with 2.525997..., but as 2.5997... I'm at a loss!
 
Would love an explanation of the scientist avoiding rounding one. Would make sense to me with 2.525997..., but as 2.5997... I'm at a loss!
 +
 +
== Scientist Cont. ==
 +
 +
(Was posted seconds before I could get mine in, so here it is in the original format.
 +
 +
This is probably completely irrelevant but it seems Randall made a small typo when trying to show a "Scientest trying to avoid rounding up."
 +
I assume it should be 2.525997*10^13. It seems he left out a 5 and a 2 and I say such because whether he forgot the 52 or 25 is up for debate.
 +
 +
Relevant screenshot: [[https://i.imgur.com/NrvOivy.png]]
 +
 +
Also, if I'm just being completely daft and am missing something completely, please feel free to criticize me harshly and I'll go back to my little hideyhole. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.237.24|108.162.237.24]] 22:21, 12 June 2020 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:21, 12 June 2020


Scientist avoiding rounding

Would love an explanation of the scientist avoiding rounding one. Would make sense to me with 2.525997..., but as 2.5997... I'm at a loss!

Scientist Cont.

(Was posted seconds before I could get mine in, so here it is in the original format.

This is probably completely irrelevant but it seems Randall made a small typo when trying to show a "Scientest trying to avoid rounding up." I assume it should be 2.525997*10^13. It seems he left out a 5 and a 2 and I say such because whether he forgot the 52 or 25 is up for debate.

Relevant screenshot: [[1]]

Also, if I'm just being completely daft and am missing something completely, please feel free to criticize me harshly and I'll go back to my little hideyhole. 108.162.237.24 22:21, 12 June 2020 (UTC)