Editing Talk:2401: Conjunction
Please sign your posts with ~~~~ |
Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
I don't think this is really that interesting (in the technical sense) to astronomers. Although in theory there could be gravitational lensing of Saturn's image by Jupiter's gravity, I'm pretty sure the effect would be too small to bother even trying to measure.[[Special:Contributions/108.162.241.18|108.162.241.18]] 14:49, 22 December 2020 (UTC) | I don't think this is really that interesting (in the technical sense) to astronomers. Although in theory there could be gravitational lensing of Saturn's image by Jupiter's gravity, I'm pretty sure the effect would be too small to bother even trying to measure.[[Special:Contributions/108.162.241.18|108.162.241.18]] 14:49, 22 December 2020 (UTC) | ||
:Astronomers might not say that, yet people might say that astronomers might say that. (Astronomers thus aren't people. And the rules require no more than three fragments of astronomer per kilo of Soylent Green before the Food Defect Action Levels are invoked.) [[Special:Contributions/141.101.98.176|141.101.98.176]] 15:31, 22 December 2020 (UTC) | :Astronomers might not say that, yet people might say that astronomers might say that. (Astronomers thus aren't people. And the rules require no more than three fragments of astronomer per kilo of Soylent Green before the Food Defect Action Levels are invoked.) [[Special:Contributions/141.101.98.176|141.101.98.176]] 15:31, 22 December 2020 (UTC) | ||
− |