Difference between revisions of "Talk:2458: Bubble Wrap"

Explain xkcd: It's 'cause you're dumb.
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 6: Line 6:
 
WD-40 is not a lubricant.  [[Special:Contributions/172.68.65.244|172.68.65.244]] 05:16, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
 
WD-40 is not a lubricant.  [[Special:Contributions/172.68.65.244|172.68.65.244]] 05:16, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
 
: You're right, but in the time it took for you to post the comment, you could have just fixed it. [[User:Bischoff|Bischoff]] ([[User talk:Bischoff|talk]]) 07:21, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
 
: You're right, but in the time it took for you to post the comment, you could have just fixed it. [[User:Bischoff|Bischoff]] ([[User talk:Bischoff|talk]]) 07:21, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
 +
::Are you sure? Its not lube despite its penetrating powers. I'll concede to that. But why wouldn't it be a lubricant? Its an oil based product. I need more context

Revision as of 07:28, 4 May 2021

In another 25 years, unpopped bubble wrap will be the only source of pure air left in the world. RAGBRAIvet (talk) 04:42, 4 May 2021 (UTC)

In 25 thousand years, scientists will use bubble wrap to see what the air what like today, in a similar fashion to how we use ice core samples to look at the atmosphere from thousands of years ago. 108.162.249.74 04:54, 4 May 2021 (UTC)

WD-40 is not a lubricant. 172.68.65.244 05:16, 4 May 2021 (UTC)

You're right, but in the time it took for you to post the comment, you could have just fixed it. Bischoff (talk) 07:21, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
Are you sure? Its not lube despite its penetrating powers. I'll concede to that. But why wouldn't it be a lubricant? Its an oil based product. I need more context