Difference between revisions of "Talk:2531: Dark Arts"

Explain xkcd: It's 'cause you're dumb.
Jump to: navigation, search
(Comment)
Line 12: Line 12:
  
 
Which specific IT professional is the explanation referring to? [[Special:Contributions/141.101.105.35|141.101.105.35]] 12:40, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
 
Which specific IT professional is the explanation referring to? [[Special:Contributions/141.101.105.35|141.101.105.35]] 12:40, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
 +
 +
As an added wrinkle, the alt text's search is cursed because there is [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ext_JS a javascript framework] completely unrelated to the ext filesystem that is ''also'' called ext, which had a version 4 and would thus muddy the waters of the search. 
 +
-- [[Special:Contributions/172.70.178.51|172.70.178.51]] 13:15, 21 October 2021 (UTC)

Revision as of 13:15, 21 October 2021


Whoo, my first "first explanation". It's not a particularly thorny comic but my explanation could still use some judicious editing I'm sure. Esogalt (talk) 06:51, 21 October 2021 (UTC)

I added a "citation needed" to the claim that letting arbitrary websites modify your filesystem is a Bad Idea, because I couldn't resist >.< 172.68.132.74 08:40, 21 October 2021 (UTC)

[citation needed] 162.158.88.113 10:45, 21 October 2021 (UTC)

The previous comment is almost worth an XKCD comic of its own. --162.158.203.24 10:10, 21 October 2021 (UTC)

WTH did Randal do that lead him to put ext4 and javascript in the same search, and why does he think hardlinks are the problem with such a cursed search? 172.69.69.182 10:17, 21 October 2021 (UTC)

Which specific IT professional is the explanation referring to? 141.101.105.35 12:40, 21 October 2021 (UTC)

As an added wrinkle, the alt text's search is cursed because there is a javascript framework completely unrelated to the ext filesystem that is also called ext, which had a version 4 and would thus muddy the waters of the search. -- 172.70.178.51 13:15, 21 October 2021 (UTC)