Difference between revisions of "Talk:2541: Occam"
(That got complicated fast.) |
|||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
Which promptly was greatly expanded. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.106.131|162.158.106.131]] 20:28, 12 November 2021 (UTC) | Which promptly was greatly expanded. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.106.131|162.158.106.131]] 20:28, 12 November 2021 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Aye, sorry about that. I also thought I was minimalist (except for the different Incomplete-BOT-thing submitted, probably) and consciously overwrote you after edit-conflict. I might not have done, but I believe your explanation would have suffered later hyperverbiation by others, anyway, but mine covered at least one extra issue (the continuity of the razor throughout it all) that could postpone this. [[Special:Contributions/172.70.162.57|172.70.162.57]] 20:36, 12 November 2021 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 20:36, 12 November 2021
The minimalist nature of the cartoon seems appropriate to the subject.
I think keeping the explanation simple would also be appropriate.
My attempt was:
Combines Occam's razor with the barber paradox.
The title text refers to Murphy's law.
Which promptly was greatly expanded. 162.158.106.131 20:28, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
Aye, sorry about that. I also thought I was minimalist (except for the different Incomplete-BOT-thing submitted, probably) and consciously overwrote you after edit-conflict. I might not have done, but I believe your explanation would have suffered later hyperverbiation by others, anyway, but mine covered at least one extra issue (the continuity of the razor throughout it all) that could postpone this. 172.70.162.57 20:36, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
