Difference between revisions of "Talk:531: Contingency Plan"

Explain xkcd: It's 'cause you're dumb.
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 1: Line 1:
 
I don't think the idea is that the parents would kill the child if something went wrong (that would not be responsible parenting.)  I think the idea is that the child would not be able to run away from home and there would be no incentive for someone to kidnap the child, since it could not live without insulin from the parents. {{unsigned ip|‎213.203.138.251}}
 
I don't think the idea is that the parents would kill the child if something went wrong (that would not be responsible parenting.)  I think the idea is that the child would not be able to run away from home and there would be no incentive for someone to kidnap the child, since it could not live without insulin from the parents. {{unsigned ip|‎213.203.138.251}}
 +
 +
:Given the story of Jurassic Park I think you are wrong. [[Special:Contributions/184.66.160.91|184.66.160.91]] 16:35, 22 October 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:35, 22 October 2013

I don't think the idea is that the parents would kill the child if something went wrong (that would not be responsible parenting.) I think the idea is that the child would not be able to run away from home and there would be no incentive for someone to kidnap the child, since it could not live without insulin from the parents. ‎213.203.138.251 (talk) (please sign your comments with ~~~~)

Given the story of Jurassic Park I think you are wrong. 184.66.160.91 16:35, 22 October 2013 (UTC)