Talk:632: Suspicion

Explain xkcd: It's 'cause you're dumb.
Revision as of 03:13, 11 January 2016 by (talk)
Jump to: navigation, search

"I'm more than a spambot! Our love was real!" might suggest that the spambot has actually more self-awareness/feelings than you might expect. -- Arjen 10:35, 28 December 2012 (UTC)

Or an extremely well designed spambot. ;) 20:43, 18 April 2014 (UTC)BK201

Couples wanting to check themselves can try an implementation of this test at :-) --Mormegil (talk) 15:10, 1 February 2013 (UTC)

Should we consider the name "Lisa" to be important? One of the very first chat-bots was called Eliza. 15:13, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

Don't forget that Apple's first GUI was the Lisa system. (talk) (please sign your comments with ~~~~)

I would be happy to see a reference to Philip K. Dick's Voigt-Kampff from his book 'Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?' Since it was written in 1968 and Scott used it as an inspiration to write Blade Runner. Original source and stuff. 22:31, 31 October 2013 (UTC)

Considering what's on panel #2 and #3, I thought that "getting tested" meant those ads that asks to insert your name and your partner's name to check if it's a good relationship. 14:00, 4 January 2014 (UTC)

I thought VK stood for the Russian social network. -- 15:57, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

I landed on this page on xkcd using the random button. Then when I hit the random button again, I was on the exact same page. That happen to anyone? 09:47, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

[Dilbert (October 25, 2001)] discusses this (30 September 2015's comment). 19:05, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

I'm offering the alternative interpretation that perhaps she *isn't* a spambot, but is pissed off at being given a spambot test, thus refuses to answer, leading to cueball ending the relationship. 18:28, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

Except she admits to being a spambot in the last panel. And the fact that she's a spambot is the basis for the whole joke of the comic. -Pennpenn 03:13, 11 January 2016 (UTC)