Difference between revisions of "Talk:957: Development"
Hppavilion1 (talk | contribs) ('www' takes longer to say than 'world wide web') |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Awwww, it's a baaaaby! A psychotic baby that's wrecking New Orleans! '''[[User:Davidy22|<u>{{Color|purple|David}}<font color=green size=3px>y</font></u><font color=indigo size=4px>²²</font>]]'''[[User talk:Davidy22|<tt>[talk]</tt>]] 08:40, 9 March 2013 (UTC) | Awwww, it's a baaaaby! A psychotic baby that's wrecking New Orleans! '''[[User:Davidy22|<u>{{Color|purple|David}}<font color=green size=3px>y</font></u><font color=indigo size=4px>²²</font>]]'''[[User talk:Davidy22|<tt>[talk]</tt>]] 08:40, 9 March 2013 (UTC) | ||
| + | : Eh, it's New Orleans. Wouldn't be the first time a giant baby wrecked the city, won't be the last. -Pennpenn [[Special:Contributions/108.162.250.162|108.162.250.162]] 02:58, 2 February 2016 (UTC) | ||
Pun?[[User:Weatherlawyer| I used Google News BEFORE it was clickbait]] ([[User talk:Weatherlawyer|talk]]) 10:46, 23 January 2015 (UTC) | Pun?[[User:Weatherlawyer| I used Google News BEFORE it was clickbait]] ([[User talk:Weatherlawyer|talk]]) 10:46, 23 January 2015 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | While the explanation *works*, starting with 'first some definitions' is a sure sign that it isn't written particularly *well*. It should probably be rewritten for more logical xkcdplaining. [[User:Hppavilion1|Hppavilion1]] ([[User talk:Hppavilion1|talk]]) 06:28, 16 October 2016 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 06:28, 16 October 2016
Awwww, it's a baaaaby! A psychotic baby that's wrecking New Orleans! Davidy²²[talk] 08:40, 9 March 2013 (UTC)
- Eh, it's New Orleans. Wouldn't be the first time a giant baby wrecked the city, won't be the last. -Pennpenn 108.162.250.162 02:58, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
Pun? I used Google News BEFORE it was clickbait (talk) 10:46, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
While the explanation *works*, starting with 'first some definitions' is a sure sign that it isn't written particularly *well*. It should probably be rewritten for more logical xkcdplaining. Hppavilion1 (talk) 06:28, 16 October 2016 (UTC)
