Difference between revisions of "Talk:981: Porn Folder"

Explain xkcd: It's 'cause you're dumb.
Jump to: navigation, search
(I did this. For real.)
m (Formatting)
Line 11: Line 11:
  
 
I did this. Way, way back, in version 7 (I said way, way back), the convention of directory entries "." and ".." was only a convention, not enforced. It was possible, and I did, make a directory where ".." did NOT go to the parent directory, but went to a hidden directory. Only I could find the files there.
 
I did this. Way, way back, in version 7 (I said way, way back), the convention of directory entries "." and ".." was only a convention, not enforced. It was possible, and I did, make a directory where ".." did NOT go to the parent directory, but went to a hidden directory. Only I could find the files there.
 +
 
This ended when system 3's fsck found that directory, and put it in lost+found.
 
This ended when system 3's fsck found that directory, and put it in lost+found.
 +
 
--[[User:Keybounce|Keybounce]] ([[User talk:Keybounce|talk]]) 07:38, 4 August 2017 (UTC)
 
--[[User:Keybounce|Keybounce]] ([[User talk:Keybounce|talk]]) 07:38, 4 August 2017 (UTC)

Revision as of 07:39, 4 August 2017

Its not difficult to do that. 200.196.51.166 (talk) (please sign your comments with ~~~~)

What? Apply subjective motivations to subjects?

It may easy but you would soon learn not to. I used Google News BEFORE it was clickbait (talk) 12:19, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

Xcopy would be a killer. Jakee308 (talk) 10:59, 16 June 2015 (UTC)


I did this. Way, way back, in version 7 (I said way, way back), the convention of directory entries "." and ".." was only a convention, not enforced. It was possible, and I did, make a directory where ".." did NOT go to the parent directory, but went to a hidden directory. Only I could find the files there.

This ended when system 3's fsck found that directory, and put it in lost+found.

--Keybounce (talk) 07:38, 4 August 2017 (UTC)