Difference between revisions of "Talk:993: Brand Identity"
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
There's a brand called "Ja!" from the Rewe group in Germany that uses this exact concept somewhat, but nowadays, the packages contain pictures and illustrations of all kinds, and aren't as white, simple and plain as they used to be in the past. See: http://www.rewe.de/besser-einkaufen/ja/produkte-und-infos.html | There's a brand called "Ja!" from the Rewe group in Germany that uses this exact concept somewhat, but nowadays, the packages contain pictures and illustrations of all kinds, and aren't as white, simple and plain as they used to be in the past. See: http://www.rewe.de/besser-einkaufen/ja/produkte-und-infos.html | ||
--Rolfhub 23:25, 14 September 2013 | --Rolfhub 23:25, 14 September 2013 | ||
| + | |||
| + | I think the lack of URL is just to troll the consumers. [[Special:Contributions/173.245.63.180|173.245.63.180]] 00:33, 13 November 2013 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 00:33, 13 November 2013
Notice that the sugar is inverted? Weird. --Classhole 23:22, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
- Weird, the hot sauce is also inverted BlueRoll18 (talk) 02:38, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
NONAME in Canada uses yellow boxes with black text but basically the same idea. --Pundawg 18:56, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
I didn't get this joke because I grew up eating "Slim Price" food branded exactly this way. -lolo 99.120.200.86 (talk) (please sign your comments with ~~~~)
There's a brand called "Ja!" from the Rewe group in Germany that uses this exact concept somewhat, but nowadays, the packages contain pictures and illustrations of all kinds, and aren't as white, simple and plain as they used to be in the past. See: http://www.rewe.de/besser-einkaufen/ja/produkte-und-infos.html --Rolfhub 23:25, 14 September 2013
I think the lack of URL is just to troll the consumers. 173.245.63.180 00:33, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
