Difference between revisions of "Talk:Facebook"
m |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Can we lock this page or something? It seems to be a target for many of these spammers -- [[User:256.256.256.256|256.256.256.256]] ([[User talk:256.256.256.256|talk]]) 08:56, 17 December 2021 (UTC) | Can we lock this page or something? It seems to be a target for many of these spammers -- [[User:256.256.256.256|256.256.256.256]] ([[User talk:256.256.256.256|talk]]) 08:56, 17 December 2021 (UTC) | ||
+ | :I have mentioned this somewhere or other in one of the Community Portal areas in the recentish past, as I recall. Obv. as I'm only a (real*) IP I can't do a thing, but I'd vote for this if it counts. As an actual registered user (* - kudos on the name, I've been seeing your additions and changes recently) you might have more clout with the admin-level users. | ||
+ | :But there are far too many unused accounts being created and ''surprisingly'' little actual spamdalism, I note. Whether they're being spotted and quietly neutered most of the time or just being created but 'forgotten about', I don't know. | ||
+ | :What worries me is if SEO hacks, like this frequently appears to be, still work whilst relegated to historic edits. Hopefully Google, etc, at least downgrade wiki-page info that was reverted away, possibly even penalise it. But that would be down to The Algorithm, and what their spiders do to keep The Algorithm fed. | ||
+ | :...anyhoo. Here's hoping someone else notices your edits, like I did. I don't really know who should be directly informed these days, as old admins seem to have idled out. [[Special:Contributions/172.70.86.68|172.70.86.68]] 12:19, 17 December 2021 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 12:19, 17 December 2021
Can we lock this page or something? It seems to be a target for many of these spammers -- 256.256.256.256 (talk) 08:56, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
- I have mentioned this somewhere or other in one of the Community Portal areas in the recentish past, as I recall. Obv. as I'm only a (real*) IP I can't do a thing, but I'd vote for this if it counts. As an actual registered user (* - kudos on the name, I've been seeing your additions and changes recently) you might have more clout with the admin-level users.
- But there are far too many unused accounts being created and surprisingly little actual spamdalism, I note. Whether they're being spotted and quietly neutered most of the time or just being created but 'forgotten about', I don't know.
- What worries me is if SEO hacks, like this frequently appears to be, still work whilst relegated to historic edits. Hopefully Google, etc, at least downgrade wiki-page info that was reverted away, possibly even penalise it. But that would be down to The Algorithm, and what their spiders do to keep The Algorithm fed.
- ...anyhoo. Here's hoping someone else notices your edits, like I did. I don't really know who should be directly informed these days, as old admins seem to have idled out. 172.70.86.68 12:19, 17 December 2021 (UTC)