Difference between revisions of "User talk:Asdf"
(→"Another one": new section) |
(→Eric's spam.: new section) |
||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
You got there ''just'' before I did. My intended revert colllided with yours. At least that one helpfully left who they are... *ponders what I can do to them... hmmm...* Anyway, thought I might comment, as you actually have a page sitting here ready for something to be said... Keep up the good work! ;) [[Special:Contributions/162.158.159.121|162.158.159.121]] 14:00, 3 July 2022 (UTC) | You got there ''just'' before I did. My intended revert colllided with yours. At least that one helpfully left who they are... *ponders what I can do to them... hmmm...* Anyway, thought I might comment, as you actually have a page sitting here ready for something to be said... Keep up the good work! ;) [[Special:Contributions/162.158.159.121|162.158.159.121]] 14:00, 3 July 2022 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Eric's spam. == | ||
+ | |||
+ | You know, I'd be absolutely astonished (and very concerned) if I randomly visited any website and I ended up answering a call from those who run it. Not withstanding that it's something we'd never want here (or to advertise on here, despite the best efforts of 'Eric') I can't believe it even works. And if it does work, it shouldn't! But as 'Eric' isn't going to be receptive to my thoughts on this, I thought I'd let you know, as a fellow reverter of his stuff, who would at least know what I'm talking about... ;) [[Special:Contributions/162.158.34.71|162.158.34.71]] 18:38, 10 July 2022 (UTC) |
Revision as of 18:38, 10 July 2022
Welcome
I know you are not a newbie and so I would like to see your opinions at this talk page: explain xkcd talk:Editor FAQ. The main issues right now are tables and headings. While avoiding tables seems to be consensus the headers are a more difficult issue. I try to keep this as simple as possible while a good layout is the final goal. Not easy. Any thoughts? --Dgbrt (talk) 18:07, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
Thank you for the image. Netherin5 (talk) 16:06, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
"Another one"
You got there just before I did. My intended revert colllided with yours. At least that one helpfully left who they are... *ponders what I can do to them... hmmm...* Anyway, thought I might comment, as you actually have a page sitting here ready for something to be said... Keep up the good work! ;) 162.158.159.121 14:00, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
Eric's spam.
You know, I'd be absolutely astonished (and very concerned) if I randomly visited any website and I ended up answering a call from those who run it. Not withstanding that it's something we'd never want here (or to advertise on here, despite the best efforts of 'Eric') I can't believe it even works. And if it does work, it shouldn't! But as 'Eric' isn't going to be receptive to my thoughts on this, I thought I'd let you know, as a fellow reverter of his stuff, who would at least know what I'm talking about... ;) 162.158.34.71 18:38, 10 July 2022 (UTC)