Difference between revisions of "User talk:Asdf"

Explain xkcd: It's 'cause you're dumb.
Jump to: navigation, search
("Another one": new section)
(Eric's spam.: new section)
Line 7: Line 7:
  
 
You got there ''just'' before I did. My intended revert colllided with yours. At least that one helpfully left who they are... *ponders what I can do to them... hmmm...* Anyway, thought I might comment, as you actually have a page sitting here ready for something to be said... Keep up the good work! ;) [[Special:Contributions/162.158.159.121|162.158.159.121]] 14:00, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
 
You got there ''just'' before I did. My intended revert colllided with yours. At least that one helpfully left who they are... *ponders what I can do to them... hmmm...* Anyway, thought I might comment, as you actually have a page sitting here ready for something to be said... Keep up the good work! ;) [[Special:Contributions/162.158.159.121|162.158.159.121]] 14:00, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
 +
 +
== Eric's spam. ==
 +
 +
You know, I'd be absolutely astonished (and very concerned) if I randomly visited any website and I ended up answering a call from those who run it. Not withstanding that it's something we'd never want here (or to advertise on here, despite the best efforts of 'Eric') I can't believe it even works. And if it does work, it shouldn't!  But as 'Eric' isn't going to be receptive to my thoughts on this, I thought I'd let you know, as a fellow reverter of his stuff, who would at least know what I'm talking about... ;) [[Special:Contributions/162.158.34.71|162.158.34.71]] 18:38, 10 July 2022 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:38, 10 July 2022

Welcome

I know you are not a newbie and so I would like to see your opinions at this talk page: explain xkcd talk:Editor FAQ. The main issues right now are tables and headings. While avoiding tables seems to be consensus the headers are a more difficult issue. I try to keep this as simple as possible while a good layout is the final goal. Not easy. Any thoughts? --Dgbrt (talk) 18:07, 25 August 2018 (UTC)

Thank you for the image. Netherin5 (talk) 16:06, 19 March 2019 (UTC)

"Another one"

You got there just before I did. My intended revert colllided with yours. At least that one helpfully left who they are... *ponders what I can do to them... hmmm...* Anyway, thought I might comment, as you actually have a page sitting here ready for something to be said... Keep up the good work! ;) 162.158.159.121 14:00, 3 July 2022 (UTC)

Eric's spam.

You know, I'd be absolutely astonished (and very concerned) if I randomly visited any website and I ended up answering a call from those who run it. Not withstanding that it's something we'd never want here (or to advertise on here, despite the best efforts of 'Eric') I can't believe it even works. And if it does work, it shouldn't! But as 'Eric' isn't going to be receptive to my thoughts on this, I thought I'd let you know, as a fellow reverter of his stuff, who would at least know what I'm talking about... ;) 162.158.34.71 18:38, 10 July 2022 (UTC)