Main Page
Welcome to the explain xkcd wiki!
We have an explanation for all 3219 xkcd comics, and only 67 (2.1%) are incomplete. Help us finish them!
Latest comic
| Eliminating the Impossible |
 Title text: 'If you've eliminated a few possibilities and you can't think of any others, your weird theory is proven right' isn't quite as rhetorically compelling. |
Explanation
The discussion in this comic plays upon the phrase originating from the fictional Sherlock Holmes (and therefore also his author, Arthur Conan-Doyle) that "When you have eliminated all which is impossible, then whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth," which describes Holmes's abductive reasoning used to solve the crimes and mysteries set before him.
White Hat is expounding this principle, to Cueball, as some key part of logic for some undisclosed purpose. Cueball argues that human error - namely, making a mistake in the 'elimination' process - is also possible, and claims that the logic is faulty on this premise. When White Hat points out that the logic is a guideline for problem-solving, Cueball argues that the possibility of human error when operating on this logic makes the logic unsound.
This, of course, ignores the entire point of the original statement: something being unlikely does not make it untrue, and ignoring reality because it is "unlikely" is both absurd and counterproductive to the process of solving a problem.
In the final panel, Cueball demonstrates a practical example of human error causing this issue. When a person is looking for their possessions, their first option is to search the house in which they presently are, while their second option is to search their mode of transportation (especially in the case of possessions that are regularly brought to and from other locations). White Hat agrees that he himself has been in the situation where he has searched the entire house, not found what he is looking for, assumes it is in the car, and then fails to locate it in the car as well. This, too, demonstrates the failing in Cueball's argument against the logic: there are other locations besides "in my house" and "in my car",[citation needed] and so even in the instance that the searcher has, in fact, searched every location in the house, they have not finished eliminating the impossible. Indeed, many people have searched both their home and their car (thoroughly and repeatedly) and ultimately found the object they were looking for in another building entirely.
In the title text, it goes further in deconstructing how it might result in a logically incorrect argument from ignorance. Although, in fiction, there is a Law of Narrative Causality, in which things are successfully resolved in the way that the plot requires them to be resolved, stating it quite so clearly would also normally be narratively unsatisfyingly.
Transcript
- [White Hat and Cueball are standing together and talking. White Hat has one hand slightly raised.]
- White Hat: As Sherlock Holmes said,
- White Hat: When you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth.
- [Close-up of Cueball's head.]
- Cueball: What about the possibility that you forgot to eliminate a possibility?
- Cueball: Or that you eliminated one incorrectly?
- Cueball: Both of those remain, too.
- [Zoom back out to show both parties. Cueball is holding his arms out.]
- White Hat: You're being pedantic.
- White Hat: It's just a general rule for deduction.
- Cueball: But it's a bad rule.
- [Cueball is now holding up one finger.]
- Cueball: How often have you thought, "I can't find this thing, and I've searched the whole house. The only place I haven't looked is the car, so it must be there."
- White Hat: ...And then it's never in the car.
- Cueball: It's never in the car!
View comic discussionNew here?
Last 7 days (Top 10) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
You can read a brief introduction about this wiki at explain xkcd. Feel free to create an account and contribute to the wiki! We need explanations for xkcd comics, characters, What If? articles, and everything in between. If it is referenced in an xkcd comic, it should be here.
- If you're new to wiki editing, see the explain xkcd:Editor FAQ for a specific guidance to this wiki and the more general help on how to edit wiki pages. There's also a handy wikicode cheatsheet.
- Discussion about the wiki itself happens at the Community portal.
- You can browse the comics from the list of all comics or by navigating the category tree at Category:Comics.
- The incomplete explanations are listed here. Feel free to help out by expanding them!
Rules
Don't be a jerk!
There are a lot of comics that don't have set-in-stone explanations; feel free to put multiple interpretations in the wiki page for each comic.
If you want to talk about a specific comic, use its discussion page.
Please only submit material directly related to xkcd and, of course, only submit material that can legally be posted and freely edited. Off-topic or other inappropriate content is subject to removal or modification at admin discretion, and users who repeatedly post such content will be blocked.
If you need assistance from an admin, post a message to the Admin requests board.
