Editing 774: Atheists
Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
==Explanation== | ==Explanation== | ||
β | In public debates, | + | In public debates, {{w|fundamentalism|fundamentalists}}, {{w|Christian}}s and {{w|atheist}}s, while having different opinions, can behave surprisingly similar. Both can be very {{w|dogmatic}} about their beliefs, and be very disrespectful and accusative towards people of the other standpoint. Cueball is blaming both parties for being annoying, so that he by that can feel superior to them both. Megan points this out, and cold then claim superiority to Cueball's behaviour. |
β | The title text | + | The title text points out that such a superiority argument could go on ad infinitum. But by introducing an arbitrary stop rule ("expires after one use per conversation"), Megan tries to resolves this issue (and (superiorly) win the argument). |
==Transcript== | ==Transcript== | ||
β | :[Cueball and Megan talking | + | :[Cueball and Megan talking.] |
:Cueball: Personally, I find atheists just as annoying as fundamentalist Christians. | :Cueball: Personally, I find atheists just as annoying as fundamentalist Christians. | ||
:Megan: Well, the important thing is that you've found a way to feel superior to both. | :Megan: Well, the important thing is that you've found a way to feel superior to both. |