Latest revision |
Your text |
Line 28: |
Line 28: |
| The 30 comes from the assumption that roughly 100% of people learn the "something" by age 30. You do not have a 1/30 chance of learning the cure to cancer this year, because there is not 100% chance of you knowing the cure to cancer by age 30. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.241.118|108.162.241.118]] 19:50, 2 March 2017 (UTC) | | The 30 comes from the assumption that roughly 100% of people learn the "something" by age 30. You do not have a 1/30 chance of learning the cure to cancer this year, because there is not 100% chance of you knowing the cure to cancer by age 30. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.241.118|108.162.241.118]] 19:50, 2 March 2017 (UTC) |
| | | |
− | I had the chance to watch Star Wars prequel with someone who did not know who was Darth Vader, the shock was amazing in Revenge of the Sith. I wish everyone can discover that plot twist! Zyramere {{unsigned ip|162.158.134.202}} | + | I had the chance to watch Star Wars prequel with someone who did not know who was Darth Vader, the shock was amazing in Revenge of the Sith. I wish everyone can discover that plot twist! Zyramere |
− | | |
− | <pre>POPULATION
| |
− | 4,000,000 People born yearly
| |
− | x 30 Everyone "IT" knows by what age (yrs)
| |
− | =
| |
− | 120,000,000 EQUALS Number of people born in 30 years who will learn "IT" at some point
| |
− | ODDS
| |
− | x 0.033333333 Odds you'll know "IT" this year (1/yrs, in this case, 1 in 30)
| |
− | x 0.002739726 Odds you'll know "IT" this day (1/365 days in a year)
| |
− | =
| |
− | 10,959 Segment of population who will learn "IT" today.
| |
− | </pre>
| |
− | NOT 10k? {{unsigned ip|172.69.42.82}}
| |
− | :It is. You got 10,959. The comic is meant to be approximate. The result is approximately 10,000. [[Special:Contributions/172.69.135.142|172.69.135.142]] 13:44, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
| |
− | | |
− | There's no precedent for the daily average. Depending on the fact, there's no reason it would be gradually learned rather than learned immediately in huge numbers upon something important bringing it to light. For rather important facts (like where your country is on a map), not knowing them would be a sign of complete obliviousness. This comic seems to only cover irrelevant facts though that would make sense to be gradually learned. There's also no precedent for spreading the learning event over a single year. Chances are some individuals wouldn't learn a fact that may be common knowledge for others of their age until much later on than the majority of people (years after others), also denoting obliviousness. For irrelevant facts, berating someone for not knowing them isn't constructive since hearing about them would be more coincidental. However, berating someone for not knowing extremely important facts only berates how oblivious they must be to not absorb such a fundamental fact. This is constructive in that the person would learn being so oblivious is not a good thing.--[[Special:Contributions/162.158.167.20|162.158.167.20]] 09:17, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
| |
− | | |
− | :Do you have any example of such fundamental fact, and when and how did you learn said fact? And do you think it's better to stay quiet about not knowing it and never learn the fundamental fact or do you think it's better to eventually learn it, albeit a bit late? --[[Special:Contributions/172.71.94.151|172.71.94.151]] 13:21, 28 December 2022 (UTC)
| |
− | | |
− | Can we add diet coke and methos or some other tag to quickly search this comic? It's pretty useful life advice.
| |