Editing Talk:1621: Fixion

The next one someone asks me what ''deux ex machina'' or parsimony is, I'm pointing them to this comic. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.245.179|108.162.245.179]] 05:17, 25 December 2015 (UTC)

The next time someone ask me what "Deus Ex Machina" or parsmony is, I'm still linking them to [https://www.tvtropes.org TV Tropes].
[[User:Papayaman1000|Papayaman1000]] ([[User talk:Papayaman1000|talk]]) 05:56, 25 December 2015 (UTC)

Concerning the title text; has anyone considered this could be a reference to [http://phineasandferb.wikia.com/wiki/Phineas_and_Ferb_Wiki Phineas and Ferb]? FRB being a reference to [http://phineasandferb.wikia.com/wiki/Ferb one] of the title characters (who speaks rarely) and the ''peryton'' a reference to [http://phineasandferb.wikia.com/wiki/Perry_the_Platypus Perry the Platypus]? Just sayin' ... --[[User:Dmbreakey|Dmbreakey]] ([[User talk:Dmbreakey|talk]]) 18:48, 25 December 2015 (UTC)

Actually, as far as I can tell, [[Randall]] is referencing the material [http://arxiv.org/abs/1504.02165 here]. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.245.179|108.162.245.179]] 23:49, 25 December 2015 (UTC)

Question is: Is the Fixion an Anion, a Kation or a Fermion? [[Special:Contributions/162.158.91.192|162.158.91.192]] 15:03, 26 December 2015 (UTC)

Maybe also a Glossary? GUT is defined on the page after use, and I mostly hit Federal Reserve Board before: [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fast_radio_burst Fast Radio Burst] [[Special:Contributions/108.162.221.26|108.162.221.26]] 16:05, 26 December 2015 (UTC)

Part of of the table text on suppressing sigma, from "The question is, if the way the Fixion works ..." through "... sigma has been artificially lowered below the proof threshold" needs work IMO, but I'm not confident I could do a good job.  I think the point attempted is that, depending on point of view, on "which"  sigma is suppressed (the value of sigma itself, or the values of data on which 5-sigma analysis is performed), the result could be either false positives or false negatives, respectively.  But, I'm not even sure I'm understanding it correctly, and I am quite sure someone other than me could concisely clarify the point.  I originally read "suppressing sigma" as only the former, resulting is false positives only, but I believe I now can grasp the other option.  [[User:Miamiclay|Miamiclay]] ([[User talk:Miamiclay|talk]]) 20:59, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
Latest revision		Your text
Line 13:		Line 13:

	Part of of the table text on suppressing sigma, from "The question is, if the way the Fixion works ..." through "... sigma has been artificially lowered below the proof threshold" needs work IMO, but I'm not confident I could do a good job. I think the point attempted is that, depending on point of view, on "which" sigma is suppressed (the value of sigma itself, or the values of data on which 5-sigma analysis is performed), the result could be either false positives or false negatives, respectively. But, I'm not even sure I'm understanding it correctly, and I am quite sure someone other than me could concisely clarify the point. I originally read "suppressing sigma" as only the former, resulting is false positives only, but I believe I now can grasp the other option. [[User:Miamiclay\|Miamiclay]] ([[User talk:Miamiclay\|talk]]) 20:59, 27 December 2015 (UTC)		Part of of the table text on suppressing sigma, from "The question is, if the way the Fixion works ..." through "... sigma has been artificially lowered below the proof threshold" needs work IMO, but I'm not confident I could do a good job. I think the point attempted is that, depending on point of view, on "which" sigma is suppressed (the value of sigma itself, or the values of data on which 5-sigma analysis is performed), the result could be either false positives or false negatives, respectively. But, I'm not even sure I'm understanding it correctly, and I am quite sure someone other than me could concisely clarify the point. I originally read "suppressing sigma" as only the former, resulting is false positives only, but I believe I now can grasp the other option. [[User:Miamiclay\|Miamiclay]] ([[User talk:Miamiclay\|talk]]) 20:59, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
−
−	Re: "this will improve with the BICEP3 data that should be published in 2016." - I assume this will have happened by now but I'm not familiar with where to look. --[[Special:Contributions/162.158.146.41\|162.158.146.41]] 08:31, 22 May 2023 (UTC)