Difference between revisions of "Talk:652: More Accurate"
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
: As far as I knew, we already have autonomous drones, but there's a law that requires that a human must pull the trigger. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.212.196|108.162.212.196]] 23:37, 6 January 2014 (UTC) | : As far as I knew, we already have autonomous drones, but there's a law that requires that a human must pull the trigger. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.212.196|108.162.212.196]] 23:37, 6 January 2014 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | At ''every'' moment of life we leave the present to enter the future...--[[Special:Contributions/108.162.229.44|108.162.229.44]] 18:38, 21 March 2014 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 18:38, 21 March 2014
MOST? You mean some aren't?
Our current level of artifical intelligence research is not really far and I doubt anyone would be trying to advance it inside armed machines. -- Hkmaly (talk) 09:03, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
- Do you just not notice the high volume of news literature on the current state of drones? The Atlantic wrote a long feature about it recently. --Quicksilver (talk) 18:58, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
The current level of our artificial intelligence research is high enough for Google to be testing driverless cars on the streets of the Bay Area. Given that, I'm sure the military is at least testing autonomous drones. Dawfedora (talk) 16:38, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
- As far as I knew, we already have autonomous drones, but there's a law that requires that a human must pull the trigger. 108.162.212.196 23:37, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
At every moment of life we leave the present to enter the future...--108.162.229.44 18:38, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
