Explain xkcd: It's 'cause you're dumb.
| || |
|I only got the explanation started.}} |+|
|−|This is a pun on the phrase “new headcanon”. A “headcanon” is … |+|
| || |
| || |
Revision as of 04:39, 30 July 2014
|| This explanation may be incomplete or incorrect: |
Please include the reason why this explanation is incomplete, like this:
If you can address this issue, please edit the page! Thanks.
This is a pun on the phrase “new headcanon”. A “headcanon” is a fan's thought imposed on a fictional world, often seen in fanfiction. Something that is 'canon' exists in the author's actual world; for example, a romantic pairing that is in the text or script of the fiction. A headcanon, then, is a fan thinking "these two characters, who are NOT together in the text, should totally be together." These ideas are notoriously contagious("It's really easy to get other people to believe in them."), and sometimes return to the author, who may decide to canonize them.
Randall's pun, adds an N and turns the imposed idea into a projectile weapon attached to the head.
|| This transcript is incomplete. Please help editing it! Thanks.
add a comment! ⋅ refresh comments!
Why are there three n's in headcannnon in the title text?
- Or as n increases the effort to convince others that the existence/correctness of headca(n)+on decreases? 22.214.171.124 20:31, 30 July 2014 (UTC)arcturius
- I think it's as simple as 1 n in canon (what the pun is based on), 2 n's in cannon (in the comic), and just to keep the pattern going, 3 n's in cannnon (in the title text).--126.96.36.199 05:35, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
That reminds me on Neil Stephensons - The Diamond Age: or A Young Lady's Illustrated Primer... Very nerdy! 188.8.131.52 (talk) (please sign your comments with ~~~~)
Another very common usage of headcanon is when you REMOVE something from your headcanon - that is, pretend that it never happened, despite it being canon. Often it's case of not-really-good sequels. Or later edits: see Han shot first. -- Hkmaly (talk) 10:35, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
- I thought that headcanon was everything fans imagined, not just what contradicts canon. --184.108.40.206 16:32, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
Anyone note that the computer is completely undamaged (from the cannonfire at least, no telling about when it strikes the floor), despite the desk being demolished? Zowayix (talk) 13:14, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
Worth mentioning the alternate term "fanon", at all? (Currently third but unlinking item Wikipedia link, or the more dangerous (in the Comic 214 sense) TVTropes link... ) 220.127.116.11 13:22, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
- I'd say no, fanon is headcanon that is accepted in huge parts of the fandom. --18.104.22.168 16:32, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
New headcanon: Black Hat Guy always has a headcannon under his hat, and in this comic he is simply showing Cueball that he got a new one. 22.214.171.124 14:12, 30 July 2014 (UTC)Matthew
- Not true. In other comics where he hasn't had his hat, he did not have a cannon on his head. 126.96.36.199 15:40, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
Canon (in Greek: Kanon, Arabic: Qanon, Hebrew: Kaneh) means reed, or straight. Thus trustworthy.  Seebert (talk) 14:38, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
Black Hat is shown to have short dark hair. That's new xkcd canon. As far as I know, he'd always been shown wearing a hat completely covering his hair until now. --Dangerkeith3000 (talk) 15:33, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
- Not new. http://xkcd.com/377/ 188.8.131.52 15:40, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
- I always assumed black hat and white hat(perhaps all the cast) were aspects of Cueball,s psyc, a jungian zoo. 184.108.40.206 (talk) (please sign your comments with ~~~~)
Ra-Ra-Rasputin 220.127.116.11 (talk) (please sign your comments with ~~~~)
"The title text is a pun on the homophones *canon* and *cannon*" ... uh, the whole entire COMIC is a pun on the homophones *canon* and *cannon*. 18.104.22.168 18:16, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
Kudos to the author(s) of the example using Quark. One of the best-written explanations on this wiki. jameslucas (" " / +) 22:42, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
"Fans might wonder why, on a station that has "replicators" (devices that can create any food or drink out of energy on demand), anyone would patronize a bar" - perhaps because they might want to, you know, socialise with other people? Call me old-fashioned... --22.214.171.124 14:23, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
Anyone know if this weeks what if is different depending on region? I only ask because it mentions my small town and I am skeptical based on past comics. 1037: Umwelt126.96.36.199 06:25, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
Well, it doesn't mention anyplace close to me :-)
188.8.131.52 09:04, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
No one has explained why the comic is titled "New". Because Black hat says "NEW HEADCANNON:" rather than "I HAVE A NEW HEADCANNON:", I think he is speaking not English, but some programming language. Black Hat created the headcannon by saying "new Headcannon:", which is a command to instantiate an object of type Headcannon. This is similar to previous strips http://xkcd.com/353/ and http://xkcd.com/413/, which attributed supernatural creative powers to Python's "import" statement. But "new Headcannon:" isn't Python. I don't know language it is. 184.108.40.206 (talk) (please sign your comments with ~~~~)
- Best I can come up with is a Quick BASIC label, but if that were the case instantiating it would have required a precedant gosub, not new. Sailorleo (talk) 21:12, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
Could the "headcannnon" refer to an idea that "blows your mind"? The trajectory of the "literal" cannon ball ends where Cueball's head was, so it went from head to head, not head to desk... --B. P. (talk) 22:34, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
- It seems more likely Black Hat is just being an asshole and shooting him in the face. -Pennpenn 220.127.116.11 02:51, 23 January 2015 (UTC)