Editing 1726: Unicode
Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
**Although it seems new development has occurred since the release of that comic, suggesting that ''Brontosaurus'' is a specific genus. But that is still debated... | **Although it seems new development has occurred since the release of that comic, suggesting that ''Brontosaurus'' is a specific genus. But that is still debated... | ||
*Those who favor a traditional, scaly image of dinosaurs vs. those who have accepted the feathered-dinosaur paradigm. | *Those who favor a traditional, scaly image of dinosaurs vs. those who have accepted the feathered-dinosaur paradigm. | ||
β | *Those who want | + | *Those who want Brontosaurus depicted as an ordinary or shrinkwrapped sauropod vs. Those who want it depicted with extra soft tissue, especially the heavy neck padding thought to be used for elephant-seal-like duels (the "Brontosmash" hypothesis). |
*Those who prefer a different dinosaur species be included instead. | *Those who prefer a different dinosaur species be included instead. | ||
*Those who oppose about the possible inclusion of pterodactyls, which are not considered to be dinosaurs. | *Those who oppose about the possible inclusion of pterodactyls, which are not considered to be dinosaurs. |