User contributions
(newest | oldest) View (newer 20 | older 20) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)
- 07:43, 7 October 2023 (diff | hist) . . (+488) . . Talk:2838: Dubious Islands (no names, alas!)
- 22:47, 29 September 2023 (diff | hist) . . (+394) . . Talk:2832: Urban Planning Opinion Progression (r: it makes no sense)
- 21:48, 25 September 2023 (diff | hist) . . (+595) . . Talk:2832: Urban Planning Opinion Progression (→Use of the unsigned templates: Netherlands! Netherlands! Netherlands!)
- 21:44, 25 September 2023 (diff | hist) . . (+822) . . Talk:2832: Urban Planning Opinion Progression (→Use of the unsigned templates: r)
- 21:41, 25 September 2023 (diff | hist) . . (+2) . . m Talk:2832: Urban Planning Opinion Progression (Back to a topic, please. If you're going to change it, please explain why.)
- 20:24, 25 September 2023 (diff | hist) . . (+823) . . m Talk:2832: Urban Planning Opinion Progression (→Use of the unsigned templates: r.)
- 18:46, 25 September 2023 (diff | hist) . . (+1,159) . . Talk:2832: Urban Planning Opinion Progression (→Use of the unsigned templates: reply to 141.101.69.53 and/or 172.70.85.58. LEAVE IT ALONE!)
- 18:36, 25 September 2023 (diff | hist) . . (-7) . . 2832: Urban Planning Opinion Progression (rv last. No es, makes no sense ("just require"), is wrong for reasonable definitions of "require" (most of the time cyclists CAN cycle off the street), and is unsupported.)
- 14:04, 25 September 2023 (diff | hist) . . (+1) . . m Talk:2832: Urban Planning Opinion Progression (Re-sort current first comment into chron. order with the rest of them, it has no special claim to primacy and mostly ruins the spontanaeity of the ''actual'' first comment.)
- 14:00, 25 September 2023 (diff | hist) . . (-1) . . m Talk:2832: Urban Planning Opinion Progression (typo)
- 13:59, 25 September 2023 (diff | hist) . . (+1,361) . . m Talk:2832: Urban Planning Opinion Progression (What is it with all these unsigned comments? tag the lof of them)
- 09:26, 25 September 2023 (diff | hist) . . (+1) . . m 2832: Urban Planning Opinion Progression (Partial rv. We understand Knit Cap to be female, see Knit Cap.)
- 23:32, 24 September 2023 (diff | hist) . . (+187) . . m Talk:2832: Urban Planning Opinion Progression (Re-subst. It doesn't NEED to be subst: but it can be, and as the original editor who added that template, it is my choice to make. Kindly don't go around reverting other people's discretionary choices for no reason, especially as an anonymous IP!)
- 21:04, 24 September 2023 (diff | hist) . . (+187) . . m Talk:2832: Urban Planning Opinion Progression (subst)
- 21:03, 24 September 2023 (diff | hist) . . (+77) . . Talk:2832: Urban Planning Opinion Progression (sign for Andrewtheexplainer; sprinkle <br>s. What does he mean by "line" here? I do not understand.)
- 16:33, 24 September 2023 (diff | hist) . . (+2) . . m 2832: Urban Planning Opinion Progression (No, use "in the street." Not Just Bikes (really had WORK WAY TOO HARD to figure out that was "NJB") is not an authority on definitons of "roads" versus "streets." But even if it were, the comic here is talking about city streets, not intercity roads.)
- 00:52, 24 September 2023 (diff | hist) . . (+6) . . m 2832: Urban Planning Opinion Progression (→Explanation: {{w|Snow Crash}})
- 00:51, 24 September 2023 (diff | hist) . . (+121) . . m 2832: Urban Planning Opinion Progression (→Explanation: refimprove citation: include party/army of dates)
- 00:42, 24 September 2023 (diff | hist) . . (+12) . . m 2832: Urban Planning Opinion Progression (→Explanation: adjust edit 324247, remove the first person ("I learned"). I don't care for "One editor" in it's place, but it's better than nothing)
- 00:39, 24 September 2023 (diff | hist) . . (0) . . m 2832: Urban Planning Opinion Progression (→Explanation: lowercase cyberbpunk)
(newest | oldest) View (newer 20 | older 20) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)