Editing Talk:1053: Ten Thousand

Jump to: navigation, search
Ambox notice.png Please sign your posts with ~~~~

Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision Your text
Line 14: Line 14:
  
 
I wonder which relative came back to life?[[User:Pennpenn|Pennpenn]] ([[User talk:Pennpenn|talk]]) 05:02, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
 
I wonder which relative came back to life?[[User:Pennpenn|Pennpenn]] ([[User talk:Pennpenn|talk]]) 05:02, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
 
Would someone care to explain the math behind this comic? {{unsigned ip|108.162.219.10}}
 
:I did a try. The age is unimportant, it's only the birth rate. I'm happy about a feedback. --[[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt|talk]]) 20:18, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
 
 
Looks like there might be a callback to this comic in the latest What-If. http://what-if.xkcd.com/135/ [[Special:Contributions/108.162.210.177|108.162.210.177]] 10:14, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
 
 
Yesterday I did just this! My mother had mentos and I had diet coke, and asked her if we should try to mix them (so I could show it to my children). And it turned out she'd never heard about it. So after we tried it with some success, I showed her this comic as well ;-) --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 13:20, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
 
 
To explain the math...In a given year the age of people under 30 is 4 million/yr * 30 yrs. Each of these people have a 1/30 chance of learning "it" in a given year: 4 000 000/yr * 30yr * 1/30yr * 1yr/365day = 4 000 000 / 365day = 10 959/day ~= 10 000 [[User:Zelcon|Zelcon]] ([[User talk:Zelcon|talk]]) 23:37, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
 
 
Before solving a math problem, the most important thing to do is recognize what you are trying figure out and what the variables are.  So let's examine your "statistics" for learning it.  I will accept your estimation of 30 years*4 million  (even though the number of people being born each year grows).  However, when we get to 1/30, I have a serious issue.  You are saying that my chance of learning anything in a given year is 1/30.  Where did you get 30 from?  The years that people are under.  So you are essentially saying that a person has a 1/x chance of learning something in a given year where x is the age?  This makes no sense!!! There is not a 1/30 chance that I am going to learn the cure to cancer this year!! {{unsigned ip|108.162.245.82}}
 
 
The 30 comes from the assumption that roughly 100% of people learn the "something" by age 30. You do not have a 1/30 chance of learning the cure to cancer this year, because there is not 100% chance of you knowing the cure to cancer by age 30. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.241.118|108.162.241.118]] 19:50, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
 
 
I had the chance to watch Star Wars prequel with someone who did not know who was Darth Vader, the shock was amazing in Revenge of the Sith. I wish everyone can discover that plot twist! Zyramere {{unsigned ip|162.158.134.202}}
 
 
<pre>POPULATION
 
4,000,000 People born yearly
 
x 30 Everyone "IT"  knows by what age (yrs)
 
=
 
120,000,000 EQUALS Number of people born in 30 years who will learn "IT" at some point
 
ODDS
 
x 0.033333333 Odds you'll know "IT" this year (1/yrs, in this case, 1 in 30)
 
x 0.002739726 Odds you'll know "IT" this day (1/365 days in a year)
 
=
 
10,959 Segment of population who will learn "IT" today.
 
</pre>
 
NOT 10k? {{unsigned ip|172.69.42.82}}
 
:It is. You got 10,959. The comic is meant to be approximate. The result is approximately 10,000. [[Special:Contributions/172.69.135.142|172.69.135.142]] 13:44, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
 
 
There's no precedent for the daily average. Depending on the fact, there's no reason it would be gradually learned rather than learned immediately in huge numbers upon something important bringing it to light. For rather important facts (like where your country is on a map), not knowing them would be a sign of complete obliviousness. This comic seems to only cover irrelevant facts though that would make sense to be gradually learned. There's also no precedent for spreading the learning event over a single year. Chances are some individuals wouldn't learn a fact that may be common knowledge for others of their age until much later on than the majority of people (years after others), also denoting obliviousness. For irrelevant facts, berating someone for not knowing them isn't constructive since hearing about them would be more coincidental. However, berating someone for not knowing extremely important facts only berates how oblivious they must be to not absorb such a fundamental fact. This is constructive in that the person would learn being so oblivious is not a good thing.--[[Special:Contributions/162.158.167.20|162.158.167.20]] 09:17, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
 
 
:Do you have any example of such fundamental fact, and when and how did you learn said fact? And do you think it's better to stay quiet about not knowing it and never learn the fundamental fact or do you think it's better to eventually learn it, albeit a bit late? --[[Special:Contributions/172.71.94.151|172.71.94.151]] 13:21, 28 December 2022 (UTC)
 
 
Can we add diet coke and methos or some other tag to quickly search this comic? It's pretty useful life advice.
 

Please note that all contributions to explain xkcd may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see explain xkcd:Copyrights for details). Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

To protect the wiki against automated edit spam, we kindly ask you to solve the following CAPTCHA:

Cancel | Editing help (opens in new window)

Templates used on this page: