Editing Talk:1314: Photos

Jump to: navigation, search
Ambox notice.png Please sign your posts with ~~~~

Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision Your text
Line 27: Line 27:
  
 
::That doesn't sound much like Black Hat to me.  Wouldn't he just try to steal the camera?  [[Special:Contributions/108.162.219.223|108.162.219.223]] 01:54, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
 
::That doesn't sound much like Black Hat to me.  Wouldn't he just try to steal the camera?  [[Special:Contributions/108.162.219.223|108.162.219.223]] 01:54, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
 
::: I think that Black Hat would be more "Being a trained photographer teaches you to limit your perception to what you see through the lens and to think about how your picture is going look, and you lose sight of me stealing your car." [[User:Kyt|Kyt]] ([[User talk:Kyt|talk]]) 02:49, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
 
  
 
Did anyone even read that abstract ( http://pss.sagepub.com/content/early/2013/12/04/0956797613504438.abstract ) ?  It actually supported Cueball more than it did White Hat.  If you just take a picture *instead* of looking seriously at the subject, then yes of course you won't have strong memories of it.  But if you analyse the subject with the purpose of taking an effective picture, then there is no such impairment.  Plus, you have a photograph.  I'm removing the 'great irony' part of the explanation.  Note that the rest of it is still very poor.  [[Special:Contributions/108.162.219.223|108.162.219.223]] 02:00, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
 
Did anyone even read that abstract ( http://pss.sagepub.com/content/early/2013/12/04/0956797613504438.abstract ) ?  It actually supported Cueball more than it did White Hat.  If you just take a picture *instead* of looking seriously at the subject, then yes of course you won't have strong memories of it.  But if you analyse the subject with the purpose of taking an effective picture, then there is no such impairment.  Plus, you have a photograph.  I'm removing the 'great irony' part of the explanation.  Note that the rest of it is still very poor.  [[Special:Contributions/108.162.219.223|108.162.219.223]] 02:00, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

Please note that all contributions to explain xkcd may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see explain xkcd:Copyrights for details). Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

To protect the wiki against automated edit spam, we kindly ask you to solve the following CAPTCHA:

Cancel | Editing help (opens in new window)

Templates used on this page: