Talk:1847: Dubious Study
The name of the organisation is suggestive of legitimacy but rather vague. That would be a red flag for me. 108.162.245.166 06:01, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
"downloaded bi-annually" is misleadingly close to "released bi-annually" --JakubNarebski (talk) 07:03, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
The National Academy of Proceedings sounds more like a legal document collection than a scientific journal to me. The Awesome Gjgfuj (talk) 07:21, 7 June 2017 (UTC)