Editing Talk:2543: Never Told Anyone
Please sign your posts with ~~~~ |
Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
::Though I'm not as obsessive with Star Wars to know this particular number, I know that the THX 1138 4EB meme pops up again throughout Lucas's later oevre, and (like just the other day) gets co-opted referentially by the Randalls of this world. Forty-odd years of obsession by generations of fans would not leave a single remastered pixel/unremastered grain of footage unanalysed of every last detail. I've personally used "6EQUJ5" as an obscure reference, at times, and had others have known/worked out what I was echoing (even before Google) and that's from a far more transient source... [[Special:Contributions/172.70.90.211|172.70.90.211]] 11:35, 18 November 2021 (UTC) | ::Though I'm not as obsessive with Star Wars to know this particular number, I know that the THX 1138 4EB meme pops up again throughout Lucas's later oevre, and (like just the other day) gets co-opted referentially by the Randalls of this world. Forty-odd years of obsession by generations of fans would not leave a single remastered pixel/unremastered grain of footage unanalysed of every last detail. I've personally used "6EQUJ5" as an obscure reference, at times, and had others have known/worked out what I was echoing (even before Google) and that's from a far more transient source... [[Special:Contributions/172.70.90.211|172.70.90.211]] 11:35, 18 November 2021 (UTC) | ||
::: 6EQUJ5 is no longer considered a one time code. In the 70s, it was inexplicable, but since then it has been found again. In fact, it is not considered to have a unique source. [[Special:Contributions/172.70.82.111|172.70.82.111]] 20:20, 18 November 2021 (UTC) | ::: 6EQUJ5 is no longer considered a one time code. In the 70s, it was inexplicable, but since then it has been found again. In fact, it is not considered to have a unique source. [[Special:Contributions/172.70.82.111|172.70.82.111]] 20:20, 18 November 2021 (UTC) | ||
β | |||
Aren't one time codes also used for Bluetooth pairing? If so, couldn't this be considered a marriage proposal? --[[User:Divad27182|Divad27182]] ([[User talk:Divad27182|talk]]) 13:49, 18 November 2021 (UTC) | Aren't one time codes also used for Bluetooth pairing? If so, couldn't this be considered a marriage proposal? --[[User:Divad27182|Divad27182]] ([[User talk:Divad27182|talk]]) 13:49, 18 November 2021 (UTC) |