Editing Talk:2876: Range Safety
Please sign your posts with ~~~~ |
Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
: I doubt it's a specific reference - it's a pretty common joke - cf. 'What do we even pay you for?' | : I doubt it's a specific reference - it's a pretty common joke - cf. 'What do we even pay you for?' | ||
β | + | == SpaceX? == | |
+ | |||
My first thought was SpaceX, e.g. the 2020-12-09 SN8 flight: https://www.google.com/search?q=spacex%20sn8%20faa | My first thought was SpaceX, e.g. the 2020-12-09 SN8 flight: https://www.google.com/search?q=spacex%20sn8%20faa | ||
There was also some coverage of the 2022-02-03 Starlink launch which implied it would've been more prudent to "wait out the storm": https://time.com/6146986/space-x-satellites-solar-storm/, but skimming academic articles makes it sound like losing so many satellites was surprising to forecasters: https://www.google.com/search?q=february+3+2022+starlink+launch+space+weather | There was also some coverage of the 2022-02-03 Starlink launch which implied it would've been more prudent to "wait out the storm": https://time.com/6146986/space-x-satellites-solar-storm/, but skimming academic articles makes it sound like losing so many satellites was surprising to forecasters: https://www.google.com/search?q=february+3+2022+starlink+launch+space+weather | ||
[[User:Mikey.r|Mikey.r]] ([[User talk:Mikey.r|talk]]) 08:49, 4 January 2024 (UTC) | [[User:Mikey.r|Mikey.r]] ([[User talk:Mikey.r|talk]]) 08:49, 4 January 2024 (UTC) |