Difference between revisions of "Talk:429: Fantasy"
(Added literary ref) |
|||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
It seems like an important distinction that in the comic Megan wonders how but the description says she wonders why. The comic doesn't actually give us a reason why they cannot be together- it could be ling distance just as easily as unrequited love. [[User:Bbruzzo|Bbruzzo]] ([[User talk:Bbruzzo|talk]]) 18:23, 20 August 2015 (UTC) | It seems like an important distinction that in the comic Megan wonders how but the description says she wonders why. The comic doesn't actually give us a reason why they cannot be together- it could be ling distance just as easily as unrequited love. [[User:Bbruzzo|Bbruzzo]] ([[User talk:Bbruzzo|talk]]) 18:23, 20 August 2015 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | Ive always thought this comic bears some similarities to Jorges Luis Borges' short story, [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Circular_Ruins The Circular Ruins] |
Latest revision as of 19:18, 17 August 2020
I think the "impossible" part is not their relationship, but the fact they don't remember how it happened. -- Hkmaly (talk) 23:52, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
- Any particular impossibility is not explained, but I believe it is implied in Cueball's first sentence "If only there were some way we could..." implying that there is no way that they could. Brettpeirce (talk) 13:47, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
It seems like an important distinction that in the comic Megan wonders how but the description says she wonders why. The comic doesn't actually give us a reason why they cannot be together- it could be ling distance just as easily as unrequited love. Bbruzzo (talk) 18:23, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
Ive always thought this comic bears some similarities to Jorges Luis Borges' short story, The Circular Ruins