Difference between revisions of "Talk:682: Force"
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
The explanation describes that some arrangements allow strangulation to continue after loss of conciousness but the use of the force is explicitly fuelled by willpower so how could Vader still be under for so long after going under unless he was too forceful and broke his neck? [[Special:Contributions/172.70.189.77|172.70.189.77]] 16:12, 12 April 2023 (UTC) | The explanation describes that some arrangements allow strangulation to continue after loss of conciousness but the use of the force is explicitly fuelled by willpower so how could Vader still be under for so long after going under unless he was too forceful and broke his neck? [[Special:Contributions/172.70.189.77|172.70.189.77]] 16:12, 12 April 2023 (UTC) | ||
| + | * He probably broke his ribs trying to block his lungs from breathing. | ||
Revision as of 05:34, 2 May 2024
"I find your lack of length disturbing"Jakee308 (talk) 18:32, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
The explanation describes that some arrangements allow strangulation to continue after loss of conciousness but the use of the force is explicitly fuelled by willpower so how could Vader still be under for so long after going under unless he was too forceful and broke his neck? 172.70.189.77 16:12, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
- He probably broke his ribs trying to block his lungs from breathing.
