|
Please sign your posts with ~~~~
|
Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision |
Your text |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
− | Perhaps the flyer itself IS the study? If many people picks the number then the result would be that people cannot distinguish the scams. {{unsigned ip|103.31.5.88}} | + | Perhaps the flyer itself IS the study? If many people picks the number then the result would be that people cannot distinguish the scams. |
− | | |
− | Doesn't work though. Because of the paradox involved. If it is actually a study, it doesn't prove anything if people pick it, because it is not a kidney harvesting scam. And if it is a kidney harvesting scam, it is not a study and thus the result doesn't matter (Except for the people who lack kidneys now)
| |
− | | |
− | Actually, it’s hinted at very strongly that it IS a kidney harvesting scam. [[Special:Contributions/172.68.47.6|172.68.47.6]] 00:56, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
| |
− | | |
− | Yes, I thought it was supposed to be both when I read this one. --[[Special:Contributions/108.162.215.58|108.162.215.58]] 00:41, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
| |
− | | |
− | I wonder how this would work. Maybe some people get a kidney harvesting scam and some get a sugar pill. [[Special:Contributions/172.71.174.237|172.71.174.237]] 19:06, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
| |