Difference between revisions of "User talk:PinkAmpersand"

Explain xkcd: It's 'cause you're dumb.
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 1: Line 1:
 
Hi, please keep your explains short. If all Google phrases explained by that complexity as you are doing at [[1256: Questions]] the page would explode. Please shorten your posts. One more hint: tl;dr just means it's too much for the reader.--[[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt|talk]]) 22:01, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
 
Hi, please keep your explains short. If all Google phrases explained by that complexity as you are doing at [[1256: Questions]] the page would explode. Please shorten your posts. One more hint: tl;dr just means it's too much for the reader.--[[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt|talk]]) 22:01, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
 
:Why are comprehensive, good explanations a bad thing? It covers everything that needs to be covered to answer the question. Why is this worth debate? '''[[User:Davidy22|<u>{{Color|#707|David}}<font color=#070 size=3>y</font></u><font color=#508 size=4>²²</font>]]'''[[User talk:Davidy22|<tt>[talk]</tt>]] 02:28, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
 
:Why are comprehensive, good explanations a bad thing? It covers everything that needs to be covered to answer the question. Why is this worth debate? '''[[User:Davidy22|<u>{{Color|#707|David}}<font color=#070 size=3>y</font></u><font color=#508 size=4>²²</font>]]'''[[User talk:Davidy22|<tt>[talk]</tt>]] 02:28, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
 +
::Just because a single explain, filling up the entire screen, on a comic needing more than 500 explains would just die in the mass of posts. TL;DR is just a simple reaction most viewers do.--[[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt|talk]]) 21:47, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:47, 27 August 2013

Hi, please keep your explains short. If all Google phrases explained by that complexity as you are doing at 1256: Questions the page would explode. Please shorten your posts. One more hint: tl;dr just means it's too much for the reader.--Dgbrt (talk) 22:01, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

Why are comprehensive, good explanations a bad thing? It covers everything that needs to be covered to answer the question. Why is this worth debate? Davidy²²[talk] 02:28, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
Just because a single explain, filling up the entire screen, on a comic needing more than 500 explains would just die in the mass of posts. TL;DR is just a simple reaction most viewers do.--Dgbrt (talk) 21:47, 27 August 2013 (UTC)