Editing 217: e to the pi Minus pi
Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
{{w|Floating point}} numbers are how computers store non-integer real numbers as decimals — or rather, in most cases, approximate them: infinite amounts of data would be required to represent most numbers in decimal form (exceptions are {{w|integers}} and {{w|terminating decimal}}s). The "floating-point handlers" would be the code performing the e<sup>π</sup> − π calculation. | {{w|Floating point}} numbers are how computers store non-integer real numbers as decimals — or rather, in most cases, approximate them: infinite amounts of data would be required to represent most numbers in decimal form (exceptions are {{w|integers}} and {{w|terminating decimal}}s). The "floating-point handlers" would be the code performing the e<sup>π</sup> − π calculation. | ||
− | ACM is the {{w|Association for Computing Machinery}}, which at the time of writing sponsored the {{w|ACM International Collegiate Programming Contest|International Collegiate Programming Contest}}. It is likely that it was this competition, in which Black Hat wasted his | + | ACM is the {{w|Association for Computing Machinery}}, which at the time of writing sponsored the {{w|ACM International Collegiate Programming Contest|International Collegiate Programming Contest}}. It is likely that it was this competition, in which Black Hat wasted his teams time, for which he got kicked out. |
− | The title text pokes fun at another coincidence: ∜(9² + 19²/22) ≈ 3.1415926525, equating close to π (deviating only in the 9th decimal place). The humor comes from the fact that π is {{w|transcendental number|transcendental}}. Transcendental numbers are numbers that cannot be expressed through basic arithmetic with integers; one cannot end up with the exact value for any transcendental number (including π) by adding, subtracting, multiplying, dividing, exponentiating, and/or taking the nth root of any rational number, meaning the title text cannot possibly be true | + | Some random facts about the math here: |
+ | |||
+ | * e<sup>π</sup> − π is an {{w|irrational number}}, but this is not a trivial fact. It was proven by {{w|Yuri Valentinovich Nesterenko}} in the late 20th century. | ||
+ | * The mysterious almost-equation is believed to be a {{w|mathematical coincidence}}, or a numerical relationship that "just happens" with no satisfactory explanation. It can be rearranged to (π + 20)<sup>i</sup> ≈ −1, so cos(ln(π + 20)) ≈ −1. Piling on a few more cosines gives cos(π cos(π cos(ln(π + 20)))) ≈ −1, which is off by 3.932×10<sup>−35</sup>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | The title text pokes fun at another coincidence: ∜(9² + 19²/22) ≈ 3.1415926525, equating close to π (deviating only in the 9th decimal place). The humor comes from the fact that π is {{w|transcendental number|transcendental}}. Transcendental numbers are numbers that cannot be expressed through basic arithmetic with integers; one cannot end up with the exact value for any transcendental number (including π) by adding, subtracting, multiplying, dividing, exponentiating, and/or taking the nth root of any rational number, meaning the title text cannot possibly be true. | ||
A much later comic, [[1047: Approximations]], puts forth quite a few more mathematical coincidences. | A much later comic, [[1047: Approximations]], puts forth quite a few more mathematical coincidences. | ||
Line 27: | Line 32: | ||
:Cueball: That's awful. | :Cueball: That's awful. | ||
:Black Hat: Yeah, they dug through half their algorithms looking for the bug before they figured it out. | :Black Hat: Yeah, they dug through half their algorithms looking for the bug before they figured it out. | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
{{comic discussion}} | {{comic discussion}} |