Editing 2842: Inspiraling Roundabout

Jump to: navigation, search

Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision Your text
Line 3: Line 3:
 
| date      = October 16, 2023
 
| date      = October 16, 2023
 
| title    = Inspiraling Roundabout
 
| title    = Inspiraling Roundabout
| image    = inspiraling roundabout 2x.png
+
| image    = inspiraling_roundabout.png
| imagesize = 480x502px
 
| noexpand  = true
 
 
| titletext = Look, I just think we need to stop coddling those hedonistic roundabout hogs who get into the inner lane and circle for hours, wasting valuable capacity.
 
| titletext = Look, I just think we need to stop coddling those hedonistic roundabout hogs who get into the inner lane and circle for hours, wasting valuable capacity.
 
}}
 
}}
 
==Explanation==
 
==Explanation==
 +
{{incomplete|Created by RUNAROUND SUE}}
 +
 
This is the second consecutive comic that deals with confusing directions given to road users.
 
This is the second consecutive comic that deals with confusing directions given to road users.
  
Line 17: Line 17:
 
The caption states that it's "[[Technically|technically]] navigable", but that the Highway Department has vetoed it, presumably because of its deliberate complexity, impracticality, and the high risk of head-on collisions.
 
The caption states that it's "[[Technically|technically]] navigable", but that the Highway Department has vetoed it, presumably because of its deliberate complexity, impracticality, and the high risk of head-on collisions.
  
The system is fairly simple to use. Assuming {{w|Left- and right-hand traffic|left-hand driving / right-hand traffic}}, one could get to the next exit without entering the spiral. Getting to the subsequent exit would simply require making a lane change toward the right.  
+
The system is fairly simple to use. Assuming {{w|Left- and right-hand traffic|left-hand driving / right-hand traffic}}, one could get to the next exit without entering the spiral. Getting to the subsequent exit would simply require making a lane change toward the right.  However, if the driver doesn't change lanes -- or the ideal lane change can't be performed at the right spot -- the driver would travel ever deeper into the spiral.
  
However, Randall is likely assuming drivers who don't change lanes, in which case his design would force drivers to travel ever deeper into the spiral, reach the center, and choose one of the other two lanes to attempt to exit the roundabout.  
+
If a driver entered the center and wished to exit the roundabout at a different exit (as is typical), they would have a choice of choosing a different entrance/exit lane that leads to the desired exit (made difficult by the apparent lack of signage in the center) or to make rightward lane changes to reach the desired exit.  
  
If vehicles don't change lanes, head-on collisions would be likely in a few scenarios, such as two vehicles reaching the center at the same time, or two vehicles trying to use the same lane going in different directions, one outspiraling from the center and one inspiraling from the entrance, eventually meeting each other head-on. (In this design, each inspiraling entrance lane can also be used as an outspiraling exit lane.)
+
Additionally, the convergence of all inward-bound vehicles at the roundabout's center and the use of each lane foor both entrance and exits would risk head-on collisions if even a few vehicles used the roundabout at the same time.
  
 
The joke is that such a deliberately challenging and dangerous design would be unlikely to be approved.  
 
The joke is that such a deliberately challenging and dangerous design would be unlikely to be approved.  
Line 33: Line 33:
 
* [[253: Highway Engineer Pranks]] also has a rotary that intentionally collides cars.
 
* [[253: Highway Engineer Pranks]] also has a rotary that intentionally collides cars.
 
* [[2728: Lane Change Highway]] has a similar theme of changing lanes because the road is poorly designed -- and it was the first time Randall complained about his ideas getting rejected by traffic engineers.
 
* [[2728: Lane Change Highway]] has a similar theme of changing lanes because the road is poorly designed -- and it was the first time Randall complained about his ideas getting rejected by traffic engineers.
 +
 +
==Trivia==
 +
* Unlike inspiraling roundabouts, outspiraling roundabouts are a real thing, common across western Europe. They are known as "[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roundabout#Turbo_roundabouts turbo roundabouts]", though the design usually features at least 4 entrances/exits.
  
 
==Transcript==
 
==Transcript==
Line 40: Line 43:
 
:[Caption below the panel:]
 
:[Caption below the panel:]
 
:Even though it '''''was''''' technically navigable, the highway department vetoed my inspiraling roundabout design.
 
:Even though it '''''was''''' technically navigable, the highway department vetoed my inspiraling roundabout design.
 
==Trivia==
 
* Unlike inspiraling roundabouts, outspiraling roundabouts are a real thing, common across western Europe. They are known as "{{w|Roundabout#Turbo roundabouts|turbo roundabouts}}", though the design usually features at least 4 entrances/exits.
 
  
 
{{comic discussion}}
 
{{comic discussion}}
 
<!-- Include any categories below this line. -->
 
<!-- Include any categories below this line. -->

Please note that all contributions to explain xkcd may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see explain xkcd:Copyrights for details). Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

To protect the wiki against automated edit spam, we kindly ask you to solve the following CAPTCHA:

Cancel | Editing help (opens in new window)