Latest revision |
Your text |
Line 56: |
Line 56: |
| | | |
| Elephant's Foot should have a place here [[Special:Contributions/198.41.235.209|198.41.235.209]] 04:31, 7 January 2016 (UTC) | | Elephant's Foot should have a place here [[Special:Contributions/198.41.235.209|198.41.235.209]] 04:31, 7 January 2016 (UTC) |
− | :also exploding head syndrome. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.155.186|162.158.155.186]] 21:10, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
| |
| | | |
| A version of this chart appears in the What If? book, in the section about losing all of your DNA. | | A version of this chart appears in the What If? book, in the section about losing all of your DNA. |
− |
| |
− | I have to consider "Flesh Eating Bacteria" to be misplaced. As I understand it, these bacteria are actually common skin bacteria. They are the reason that puncture wounds should be cleaned and encouraged to bleed. [[User:Divad27182|Divad27182]] ([[User talk:Divad27182|talk]]) 21:13, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
| |
− | :Sort of. ''Streptomyces'' are indeed common skin bacteria, but with puncture wounds you're more worried about tetanus than strep. [[User:Nitpicking|Nitpicking]] ([[User talk:Nitpicking|talk]]) 22:26, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
| |
| | | |
| == Trivia == | | == Trivia == |
| | | |
− | A variant of this comic was used in '' [[What If?]]'' in which the name “Destroying Angel” was placed far out, mainly above the graph and circled. | + | A variant of this comic was used in the UK edition of '' [[What If?]]'' in which the name “Destroying Angel” was placed far out of the graph and circled. |
− | | |
− | == Geologic column ==
| |
− | | |
− | OK, someone is very determined that the cause of all stratification in the Earth's crust is liquefaction. It isn't. I don't want an edit war. Anyone else want to step in? [[User:Nitpicking|Nitpicking]] ([[User talk:Nitpicking|talk]]) 03:26, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
| |
− | :Would you like me to cite my source? [[Special:Contributions/172.71.150.140|172.71.150.140]] 03:36, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
| |
− | ::Well, yes. [[User:Nitpicking|Nitpicking]] ([[User talk:Nitpicking|talk]]) 11:28, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
| |
− | :::Okay, I cited my source. Please see my edit to the article. [[Special:Contributions/172.71.146.197|172.71.146.197]] 04:35, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
| |
− | ::::In case anyone didn't bother checking: he cited a creationist tract. That would explain why us science nerds were confused. [[User:Nitpicking|Nitpicking]] ([[User talk:Nitpicking|talk]]) 05:25, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
| |
− | :::::Yes, it is a creationist book, written by a processor and scientist with a Ph.D. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.245.166|108.162.245.166]] 06:26, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
| |
− | ::::::I edited to provide context to the claims. The <nowiki><ref>fed</nowiki> info wasn't really useful on its own, save as a "someone once said..." claim, but is more fully expounded under the author's Wiki page (with additional contextual info). Bear in mind the criticisms (scientific ''and'' religious), that you can find alongside the Amazon sales pages/etc in any search, which remain conspiciously unrebutted by the author in any meaningful way. But it is ''perhaps'' an analysis of curiosity, to mention as an aside to the idea of liquefaction. [[Special:Contributions/172.71.178.54|172.71.178.54]] 11:22, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
| |