Editing Talk:291: Dignified
Please sign your posts with ~~~~ |
Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
::Because they would not have been pushed through anyones vagina, and thus they could not be "harmed" by Beret Guys comment, or at least could be a little more dignified, because they had been gentle removed through someones stomach. So quite a good point there. I'm quite sure Randall did not think about that when he made this joke. ;-) --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 19:29, 9 May 2015 (UTC) | ::Because they would not have been pushed through anyones vagina, and thus they could not be "harmed" by Beret Guys comment, or at least could be a little more dignified, because they had been gentle removed through someones stomach. So quite a good point there. I'm quite sure Randall did not think about that when he made this joke. ;-) --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 19:29, 9 May 2015 (UTC) | ||
Isn't the staples comment from Beret Guy, not White Hat? It has it's own set of quotation marks. --[[User:Whyhow|Whyhow]] ([[User talk:Whyhow|talk]]) 19:56, 9 May 2015 (UTC) | Isn't the staples comment from Beret Guy, not White Hat? It has it's own set of quotation marks. --[[User:Whyhow|Whyhow]] ([[User talk:Whyhow|talk]]) 19:56, 9 May 2015 (UTC) | ||
β |