Difference between revisions of "Talk:2103: Midcontinent Rift System"
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
"''It is unclear why would anyone vote for such a thing, but people directly affected (the Midwest) are likely to vote against Black Hat.''" | "''It is unclear why would anyone vote for such a thing, but people directly affected (the Midwest) are likely to vote against Black Hat.''" | ||
:In the interests of accuracy, it should be noted that 2016 showed that it being unclear why anyone would vote for a thing doesn't stop them from doing so, eagerly. Even when they are are going to be directly affected very adversely. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.107.19|162.158.107.19]] 18:00, 25 January 2019 (UTC) | :In the interests of accuracy, it should be noted that 2016 showed that it being unclear why anyone would vote for a thing doesn't stop them from doing so, eagerly. Even when they are are going to be directly affected very adversely. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.107.19|162.158.107.19]] 18:00, 25 January 2019 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | Actually we ended up with a large shallow outlandish president instead. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.106.42|162.158.106.42]] 18:31, 25 January 2019 (UTC) |
Revision as of 18:31, 25 January 2019
Needs an explanation of the rift system itself. What is it? When did it form? How did conservatives feel about it at the time?
(It's definitely not a reference to Palladium Rifts, which would be a whole different thing!)
ProphetZarquon (talk) 16:12, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
If Black Hat runs, I vote for him. 141.101.104.35 15:15, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
Has anyone else thought of all the new beach front property that would be created? Lex Luthor would be proud. 108.162.245.166 15:32, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
- I have always thought the US ought to have a large shallow inland sea.
- ProphetZarquon (talk) 15:38, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
"It is unclear why would anyone vote for such a thing, but people directly affected (the Midwest) are likely to vote against Black Hat."
- In the interests of accuracy, it should be noted that 2016 showed that it being unclear why anyone would vote for a thing doesn't stop them from doing so, eagerly. Even when they are are going to be directly affected very adversely. 162.158.107.19 18:00, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
Actually we ended up with a large shallow outlandish president instead. 162.158.106.42 18:31, 25 January 2019 (UTC)